Divjoy VS Jekyll

Divjoy Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

Divjoy mentions (29)

• Building a SaaS web app - don’t want to do all the other stuff though, what’s the lazy way out?

  Agreed, check https://divjoy.com, has almost everything and helps work on the core product. Source: 10 months ago

• Why can't I buy the foundations of a SaaS web app off-the-shelf?

  Some boilerplates do offer some choices - usually around the front end, which tends to be a manageable piece to bite off. The two I'm aware of that do this reasonably well are my product SaaS Pegasus (for Python/Django) and DivJoy (for React/JS), though I'm sure there's more. Source: about 1 year ago

• Ask HN: Those with money-making side projects,how did you come up with the idea?

  I built something I wanted that I knew I would have paid for if it existed (https://divjoy.com). If I was looking for a side hustle now I'd 100% be playing with GPT-3/ChatGPT and building small tools. There's a good chance your first few experiments won't catch on, but that you'll end up being in the right place at the right time, see an opportunity, and already have the code/knowledge to get an MVP out quickly. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Ask HN: What is the best income stream you have created till date?

  A few years ago I was frustrated with how difficult it was to setup a solid React.js stack with auth, payments, etc so I built the codebase generator at https://divjoy.com It does around $5-10k in sales a month. Fairly passive. A few hours of support a week. Was full-time on it for the first few years, but decided to join a company recently and keep growing this on the side. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• I built a directory of SaaS boilerplates and frameworks featuring your favorite programming languages

  Picked a random from the list, https://divjoy.com/ and just to export a stock React Code is like $199. Not sure who they are marketing this for but good luck! Source: over 1 year ago

Jekyll mentions (180)

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago