Software Alternatives & Reviews

Deployer VS SourceHut

Compare Deployer VS SourceHut and see what are their differences

Deployer logo Deployer

Deployment Tool for PHP

SourceHut logo SourceHut

Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more
  • Deployer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-23
  • SourceHut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17

Deployer videos

Modern Deployment Bag - Force Protector Gear Deployer 75 Bag - Review

SourceHut videos

System Crafters Live! - What is GNU? • Is Sourcehut the future? • Q&A

More videos:

  • Review - Building Natalie on OpenBSD with Sourcehut

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Deployer and SourceHut)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Deployer and SourceHut. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SourceHut should be more popular than Deployer. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Deployer mentions (31)

View more

SourceHut mentions (55)

  • Ask HN: What's Happenning with SourceHut?
    For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Using Git Offline
    Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Email and Git = <3
    A few comments in-line, but I don't want to "sell" anything to you, so just FWIW. > The amount of "gotchas" in this process and the tooling required just to use git + email seems insane to me. The base system is really, really simple, but there are some common rules/guidelines that just help when working together, and those are required for forge based workflows too (or do you like a single commit touching a dozen... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: FlakeHub – Discover and publish Nix flakes
    > We're planning on expanding to support other forges, Just want to put in a request for SourceHut support in case it's not already on your list. Sometimes it gets overlooked in favor of the big corporate forges. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Vim Boss – Neovim
    Https://sourcehut.org/ fits this pretty well. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Deployer and SourceHut, you can also consider the following products

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Capistrano - A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.