DASH VS mozjpeg

Only problem I have with this promotion of Dash is that the 'Dash is Digital Cash' got snowed under with all the references to dash.org and there is also a very very short time to understand why Dash is Digital Cash. Source: over 1 year ago

All these reasons led me to develop this open source project. I chose Dash because honestly I was blown away after trying it. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

1 : Misleading title (there is no actual security breach at dash.org). Source: almost 2 years ago

Please see my post history here on reddit and on the dash.org forum. Much has already been written on the subject. Source: about 2 years ago

During Ryan's tenure at Dash, he has managed to rid the official website https://dash.org/ of any mention of the word privacy or PrivateSend, our brand. Not content with that, he took it a step further and single handedly made the decision to de-brand PrivateSend from the wallets, the codebase and the Dash documentation. This was a decision not consulted with the network, merely relayed to 'us' as important and... Source: about 2 years ago

It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

> MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago