Not too far ago, I invested several days into "mastering" and tuning TiddlyWiki. It was an interesting experience. I loved it on the whole and felt very enthusiastic about using it store all my knowledge. It's super flexible and use of tags, filters and macros make it unique. However, it's a bit complicated for mass adoption. Also, the extended use of its powerful features may make your computer tangibly slow.
That's why I found "Obsidian", that's what I'm using today to store my knowledge.
Based on our record, TiddlyWiki seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Scan. While we know about 182 links to TiddlyWiki, we've tracked only 12 mentions of CSS Scan. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: about 1 year ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 1 year ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: almost 2 years ago
πΊ A curated collection of 57 free shapes examples made with pure CSS: π https://getcssscan.com/css-shapes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
If we forego human read-write-ability to gain some interactivity, we got https://tiddlywiki.com/ , a single long html file. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago
This reminds me of Perl's http://www.blosxom.com and also https://tiddlywiki.com. Self-contained sites with minimal requirements. - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago
Tiddlywiki might be interesting. https://tiddlywiki.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I use TiddlyWiki. It's a portable editable wiki that doesn't require a web server or web hosting. You open it from your computer, edit it, and save it. You get all of the linking that you'd expect to see in a wiki, and it's super readable and easy to use. Source: 6 months ago
Hopefully, this will make it much easier for software like tiddlywiki [1] where the idea is to be as self-contained as possible. It has depended on various mechanisms to save changes to disk, but this may lower the threshold to use it and feel more streamlined [1] https://tiddlywiki.com. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
Obsidian.md - A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.
Zim Wiki - Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.