Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CSS Peeper VS WebPagetest

Compare CSS Peeper VS WebPagetest and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CSS Peeper logo CSS Peeper

Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

WebPagetest logo WebPagetest

Run a free website speed test from multiple locations around the globe using real browsers...
  • CSS Peeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-30
  • WebPagetest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-05

CSS Peeper features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    CSS Peeper features a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for designers and developers to quickly understand the CSS of any website without diving into the code.
  • Quick Inspection
    The tool allows for rapid inspection of CSS properties directly from the browser, enabling users to analyze styles more efficiently than traditional methods.
  • Extracts Colors and Assets
    CSS Peeper automatically extracts color palettes and assets from web pages, providing immediate access to crucial design elements.
  • Browser Extension
    Available as a Chrome extension, CSS Peeper is easy to install and use, integrating smoothly into the workflow of many web professionals.
  • Time-Saving
    By simplifying the process of inspecting and extracting CSS properties, CSS Peeper saves valuable time for developers and designers.
  • No Coding Required
    The tool eliminates the need for manual coding when examining CSS, making it accessible to non-developers.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Peeper

  • Limited Browser Support
    Currently, CSS Peeper is only available as a Chrome extension, limiting its use for those who prefer or require other browsers like Firefox or Safari.
  • Not Comprehensive
    While CSS Peeper is quick for basic analysis, it may not provide comprehensive details or control for advanced CSS inspection tasks that developers might need.
  • Dependency on Extension
    Reliance on a browser extension means that users must install and maintain the extension, which may not be preferred in all environments, especially restricted or managed systems.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with any browser extension, there are potential privacy concerns, particularly in terms of what data the extension might access or share.
  • Performance Impact
    Installing too many extensions, including CSS Peeper, can potentially impact browser performance, causing slower load times and increased resource usage.

WebPagetest features and specs

  • Detailed Performance Metrics
    WebPagetest provides extensive performance metrics, including Time to First Byte (TTFB), Speed Index, and First Contentful Paint, allowing for a deep understanding of website performance.
  • Real Browsers
    Tests are conducted using real browsers, which ensures that the results are closely aligned with real user experiences.
  • Geolocation Testing
    Supports testing from various locations worldwide, which is useful for understanding performance in different markets.
  • Advanced Testing Options
    Offers advanced options such as scripting for complex interactions, multi-step transactions, and authenticating users.
  • Free and Open Source
    WebPagetest is free to use and its code is open-source, allowing for community contributions and customizable implementations.
  • Video Capture
    Provides video capture of the loading process, giving a visual representation of loading performance.
  • Waterfall Charts
    Generates detailed waterfall charts that help identify bottlenecks in resource loading.

Possible disadvantages of WebPagetest

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive options and detailed metrics may be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with web performance testing.
  • Intermittent Performance
    As a free service, sometimes the performance can be inconsistent due to high demand or limited resources.
  • Dated Interface
    The user interface of the website is somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization to improve user experience.
  • Limited Instant Support
    Lack of immediate support options can be a downside; users often have to rely on forums and community support.
  • Potential for Inconsistent Results
    Results might vary between tests due to variability in internet speed, server conditions, and other external factors.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Advanced testing options require a significant amount of configuration, which can be time-consuming.

CSS Peeper videos

CSS Peeper: new tool for Web Designers

WebPagetest videos

WebPageTest - The State of the Web

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use WebPageTest.org - For Beginners

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Peeper and WebPagetest)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Website Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Performance Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Peeper and WebPagetest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CSS Peeper and WebPagetest

CSS Peeper Reviews

112 Best Chrome Extensions You Should Try (2021 List)
CSS Peeper is one of the best Chrome extensions for web developers to extract more design and focus less on digging codes. It is intuitive to use. So easy to find an element and its styles on a page than it is with the built-in ‘inspect element’ tool in Chrome browser. CSS Developers who are invariably curious about web designs should use this extension.

WebPagetest Reviews

We have no reviews of WebPagetest yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebPagetest seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Peeper. While we know about 51 links to WebPagetest, we've tracked only 3 mentions of CSS Peeper. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Peeper mentions (3)

  • Using Adobe XD to find out a website's padding?
    You can indeed inspect the site with your browser's dev tools, or you have some Chrome extensions like: https://csspeeper.com/ that make the process more straightforward. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Your code, stylish
    Think CSS inspection through DevTools impractical or intimidating? CSS Peeper arrives to make inspecting styles easier and more elegant. It also intelligently extracts the site's color palette and makes it easy to export your assets. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • 25 Chrome extension for Designers
    @CSSPeeper 🌎 https://csspeeper.com/ CSS peeper is visual version of the chrome developer tools. It's great for designers looking to quickly & easily inspect the CSS from a website. Source: over 3 years ago

WebPagetest mentions (51)

  • A PageSpeed insight report, but for every page in your domain
    Trust neither. The most optimal option I've found is webpagetest.org Its been quite handy lately. This tool does look interesting. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How are you all accurately checking your website load time? Not sure PageSpeedInsights is very helpful.
    Webpagetest.org is another. Pagespeedinsights and lighthouse are great for identifying page load issues to fix, but actual page load times will always vary between the user and your web server. Universal analytics has some page load timings but that's going away soon and nothing afaik is in GA4. I've seen an example of building a page load timer in tag manager and dumping the results into an event. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Extreme confusing over Speed Index results -- webpagetest.org
    So I am working on rebuilding our company's site with a new stack. I am running tests using webpagetest.org, and I am having trouble fully understanding the speed index results as well as the film strip view. The page renders quite fast everywhere I test it. Google Lighthouse shows it in the 90s + for performance score, however when I test the page on webpagetest, I get load times of 77 seconds (NOT MS) which is... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone else experience pure ecstasy when they get 100 on Lighthouse? 😩
    Webpagetest.org is great, and checking OP's site they have done an incredible job, I don't think I have ever made or seen an Ecom site this slick. Super clean waterfall view. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Performance scores for Google Lighthouse/Insights seem to be very inaccurate
    Thanks for the recommendation regarding webpagetest.org, another user made a similar recommendation so I will check it out. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Peeper and WebPagetest, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

GTmetrix - GTmetrix is a free tool that analyzes your page's speed performance. Using PageSpeed and YSlow, GTmetrix generates scores for your pages and offers actionable recommendations on how to fix them.

CSS Scan - Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

CSSViewer - A simple CSS property viewer

Google Lighthouse - Lighthouse is an open-source, automated tool for improving the quality of web pages.