Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CSS-Crush VS W3M

Compare CSS-Crush VS W3M and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CSS-Crush logo CSS-Crush

A standards inspired CSS pre-processor. Written in PHP.

W3M logo W3M

w3m is a text-based web browser as well as a pager like ' ...
  • CSS-Crush Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • W3M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-22

CSS-Crush features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

W3M features and specs

  • Lightweight
    W3M is a lightweight browser, making it suitable for systems with minimal resources, and performs well even on older hardware.
  • Text-based
    As a text-based browser, W3M is useful for accessing web content via command-line interfaces, which can be beneficial for users who prefer non-GUI environments.
  • Fast Performance
    Due to its minimalistic design, W3M provides fast browsing experiences, especially when handling simple webpages or when operating over slow connections.
  • Keyboard Navigation
    W3M allows efficient browsing using keyboard shortcuts, which can enhance productivity for users who master these controls.
  • Inline Image Support
    W3M supports the display of inline images when combined with certain terminal emulators, offering better multimedia support compared to some other text-based browsers.

Possible disadvantages of W3M

  • Limited Modern Web Support
    W3M struggles with rendering complex websites that rely heavily on JavaScript and modern web technologies, limiting its usability on many current sites.
  • User Interface
    The text-based user interface can be difficult for new users to adapt to, especially those accustomed to graphical web browsers.
  • Limited Interactivity
    Due to its text-based nature, W3M has limited support for interactive web features, which can impede full functionality on interactive pages.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The reliance on keyboard shortcuts and the lack of a GUI can present a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with text-based navigation.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    W3M requires a terminal interface, which might not be as appealing or accessible for users used to graphical environments.

CSS-Crush videos

No CSS-Crush videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

W3M videos

Terminal-based Web Browsing with w3m - Lunduke Show

More videos:

  • Review - nVLC Browser Extension for W3M - Linux TUI
  • Review - w3m-img -- View Images in the Console - Linux CLI

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS-Crush and W3M)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Browsers
0 0%
100% 100
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Rental Property Management

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS-Crush and W3M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, W3M seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS-Crush mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS-Crush yet. Tracking of CSS-Crush recommendations started around Mar 2021.

W3M mentions (10)

  • dnf update is downloading ImageMagick?
    [code]Installed Packages Name : w3m-img Version : 0.5.3 Release : 57.git20220429.fc37 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 32 k Source : w3m-0.5.3-57.git20220429.fc37.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo : fedora Summary : Helper program to display the inline images for w3m URL : http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ License : MIT and UCD Description : w3m-img package... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Setting up lynx
    You should check w3m http://w3m.sourceforge.net/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • The sad truth
    Try http://w3m.sourceforge.net some day. :). Source: about 3 years ago
  • w3m rocks
    Does anyone have a chart/rundown of why we should choose links/lynx/w3m? The old main page calls links / lynx "neighbors"... http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ I use links (gentoo user here), but I do not really see a huge difference between the three. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Is Firefox the only alternative to all the chromium-based browsers?
    Lynx is pretty good, but I personally like w3m. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS-Crush and W3M, you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

Lynx.invisible-island.net - Thomas Dickey is the maintainer/developer of the Lynx text-browser. This page gives some background and pointers to Lynx resources.

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

Browsh - A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers

Garden (Clojure) - Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

Links - Links is a graphics and text mode web browser, released under GPL. Links is free software.