Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Links VS CSS-Crush

Compare Links VS CSS-Crush and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Links logo Links

Links is a graphics and text mode web browser, released under GPL. Links is free software.

CSS-Crush logo CSS-Crush

A standards inspired CSS pre-processor. Written in PHP.
  • Links Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • CSS-Crush Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

Links features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Links is designed to be a lightweight web browser, making it ideal for systems with limited resources or older hardware, providing fast browsing experience without consuming excessive system resources.
  • Text-Based Mode
    Links offers a text-based mode, which can render pages in text format without graphics, useful for users needing fast, non-graphical web access or on terminals without graphical capabilities.
  • Low Bandwidth Usage
    By focusing on text content and fewer multimedia elements, Links is efficient in terms of bandwidth usage, beneficial for users with limited or metered internet connections.
  • Security
    Due to its minimalist design and fewer dependencies, Links potentially has a smaller attack surface compared to more feature-rich browsers, potentially providing enhanced security.
  • Cross-Platform
    Links is available on multiple platforms, including Linux, Windows, and Unix-like systems, providing flexibility to users across different operating systems.

Possible disadvantages of Links

  • Limited Multimedia Support
    Links lacks extensive support for modern multimedia features and dynamic content, which can lead to compatibility issues with websites that rely heavily on JavaScript or multimedia elements.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of Links is quite rudimentary compared to modern browsers, which may not appeal to users accustomed to more polished and feature-rich graphic interfaces.
  • Learning Curve
    For users new to text-based or minimalist browsers, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding how to navigate and utilize Links effectively.
  • Limited Extensions and Plugins
    Links does not support a wide range of extensions and plugins that modern browsers offer, leading to less customization and additional functionalities for users.
  • Site Compatibility
    Due to its focus on simplicity, Links may not render some modern web pages accurately, which can lead to a subpar experience on many contemporary websites.

CSS-Crush features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Links videos

Heavy Links REVIEW!!!

More videos:

  • Review - LINKS HAIR REVIEW:WATCH ME SLAY THIS INSTALL FT LINKS HAIR

CSS-Crush videos

No CSS-Crush videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Links and CSS-Crush)
Web Browsers
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Rental Property Management
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Links and CSS-Crush. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Links seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Links mentions (20)

  • Lynx is the oldest web browser still being maintained
    I use http://links.twibright.com for surfing the local folders and lynx to retrieve pages. A little bit of sanity in this crazy world. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Stupid Problems Require Stupid Solutions (Cloudflare Is Breaking My SVGs)
    Every dash they remove is a byte (at least!) saved. This increases shareholder value. Your side note is solved by using the Links Browser[0]. I don't see the need to present a professional page when you're calling out one of the top 10 single points of global internet failure.[1] [0]http://links.twibright.com/ [1]Cloudflare routes 43% of the top 10,000 sites globally. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Show HN: Dillo 3.1.0 released after 9 years
    Links+ it's still posting releases, it's 2.29 right now. http://links.twibright.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • MicroWeb 2.0 – DOS web browser for Intel 8088
    I'm assuming author is aware of (E)Links? http://links.twibright.com At least Links seems to have a DOS version. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Frogmouth – A Markdown browser for your terminal
    Http://links.twibright.com is the website, but the easiest way to try it is probably to search your preferred package manager. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

CSS-Crush mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS-Crush yet. Tracking of CSS-Crush recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Links and CSS-Crush, you can also consider the following products

W3M - w3m is a text-based web browser as well as a pager like ' ...

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

Lynx.invisible-island.net - Thomas Dickey is the maintainer/developer of the Lynx text-browser. This page gives some background and pointers to Lynx resources.

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

Browsh - A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers

Garden (Clojure) - Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.