Based on our record, Cryptomator seems to be a lot more popular than LZ4. While we know about 295 links to Cryptomator, we've tracked only 7 mentions of LZ4. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The best way to do this is with https://cryptomator.org. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Before putting anything on a cloud service I would recommend 3rd party tools, like Cryptomator, to encrypt folders and such, then upload to a cloud service. Source: 5 months ago
I've used countless encryption "schemes" over the years, from True/Vera-Crypt to encrypted sparse bundles/images, and none have ever really felt right. These days I tend to use Cryptomator[0] instead. It accomplishes what none of the others could do, which is transparent encryption across devices. With Cryptomator, I simply create a vault somewhere in the cloud, stuff data in it, and I can access it from my... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Cryptomator[0] hooked up to Dropbox. [0] https://cryptomator.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Cryptomator's arguably the most popular encryption software for cloud storage (you can give yourself zero-knowledge encryption by using them) - it's actually what they specialize & focus on (cloud encryption). It's 100% open source and Free to use on computers. On phones I believe it's just a 1-time fee of a few bucks ($13-14, then you have it forever) - note: their iOS offering is still new, so may be a bit... Source: 11 months ago
LZ4[1] intentionally compresses worse than Deflate—where Deflate is LZ77 with Huffman, LZ4 is just LZ77. It’s “we’re saturating Gigabit Ethernet and have some compute left over” compression, not “we need to squeeze our backups as much as possible” compression. If filtering+LZ4 does better than Deflate, then you’ve chosen the filter well. Curiously, for some kinds of binary serialization a good filter in... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
It doesn't destroy performance for the simple reason that nowadays memory access has higher latency than pure compute. If you need to use compute to produce some data to be stored in memory, your overall throughput could very well be faster than without compression. There have been a large amount of innovation on fast compression in recent years. Traditional compression tools like gzip or xz are geared towards... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Just looked it up [1] > LZ4 is lossless compression algorithm, providing compression speed > 500 MB/s per core (>0.15 Bytes/cycle). It features an extremely fast decoder, with speed in multiple GB/s per core (~1 Byte/cycle). [1]: https://lz4.github.io/lz4/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Planet: weekly As you can see the planet file has the LZ4 extension, this is a compression-algorithm which a very good speed/size ratio and reduces the size with about 20-25 GB. It. Source: almost 2 years ago
I found this interesting dataLZ4 HC (r101) -9) increases transfer speed by about 22%, while only losing a 10% performance on decompression. That's a 12% performance increase overall, not bad! Source: over 2 years ago
VeraCrypt - VeraCrypt is a free open source disk encryption software for Windows, Mac OSX and Linux.
The Unarchiver - Get the top application for archives on Mac. It's a RAR extractor, it allows you to unzip files, and works with dozens of other formats.
BoxCryptor - Boxcryptor encrypts your sensitive files before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, and many others.
7-Zip ZS - A fork of 7-Zip with support for Brotli, Fast-LZMA2, Lizard, LZ4, LZ5 and Zstandard
Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration
WinZip - The world's best file compressor in the world.