Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS Simple Grid

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Simple Grid and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Simple Grid logo Simple Grid

Responsive & lightweight CSS grid for your website.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Simple Grid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-06

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Simple Grid features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Simple Grid is designed with simplicity in mind, making it easy for developers to implement and use in their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Being a minimalistic framework, Simple Grid adds very little overhead, ensuring fast loading times and performance.
  • Responsive Design
    It provides a straightforward way to create responsive layouts, ensuring websites look good on all devices.
  • Customizable
    Developers can easily customize the framework to fit the specific requirements of their projects.

Possible disadvantages of Simple Grid

  • Limited Features
    Simple Grid focuses on being lightweight, which means it does not include many advanced features found in other frameworks.
  • Lack of Community Support
    Being a niche framework, it might not have as large a community or as many resources for support and troubleshooting.
  • No Built-in Components
    Unlike larger frameworks, Simple Grid does not offer pre-built UI components, which means additional development work might be required.
  • Maintenance
    Depending on the frequency of updates from the developers, there might be concerns about long-term maintenance and updates.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Simple Grid videos

Fullby Simple Grid Wordpress Theme

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Simple Grid)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Simple Grid. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CrossBrowserTesting and Simple Grid

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

Simple Grid Reviews

20 Best Front-End Frameworks For Bootstrap Alternative
Simple Grid is a very lightweight, responsive grid system. It’s not like other frameworks that have that fancy button, menu, table, etc, Simple Grid offers only a pure grid. The grid feature is based on 1140 px screen size with 12 columns that you can customize to get your best layout.
Source: beebom.com
15 Fabulous Alternatives to Bootstrap, Foundation and Skeleton
Simple Grid helps web designers to swiftly customize their products. It is weightless and has a 12 column layout built-in the form of girds.
Source: www.agriya.com
The 21 Most Used Bootstrap Alternatives
Simple Grid is a basic lightweight grid, not a CSS framework. With a pure grid support and 12 column layout, you can easily customize your project with Simple Grid.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than Simple Grid. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

Simple Grid mentions (2)

  • W3.css – A Minimal Alternative to Bootstrap
    From my experience with Bootstrap I can tell you the only thing you really need is the grid part of it and there are so many lightweight "frameworks" that have just that and its only 250 lines of css in the example of simple grid: https://simplegrid.io/ Everything else, buttons, modals, sliders, chords are super simple anyway you can just make them yourself or use a way more featurerich separate slider or modal... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Need a framework recomendation for CSS grid
    a lightweight css grid is https://simplegrid.io/. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Simple Grid, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

CSS Gridish - Automatically build your grid design's CSS code ✨

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Flexbox Grid - Grid based on CSS3 flexbox