Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Flexbox Grid VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Flexbox Grid VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Flexbox Grid logo Flexbox Grid

Grid based on CSS3 flexbox

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • Flexbox Grid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Flexbox Grid features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Flexbox Grid is designed to create complex layouts that adapt seamlessly to different screen sizes, facilitating responsive web design.
  • Simplified Alignment
    The use of Flexbox makes it easier to align and distribute space among items in a container without using floats or positioning.
  • Consistency
    Flexbox Grid provides a consistent layout structure, making it easier to maintain and scale web projects without layout issues.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Flexbox is supported by most modern browsers, ensuring that Flexbox Grid layouts work across various platforms.
  • Flexible Layouts
    Flexbox Grid allows for flexible and dynamic grid layouts that can be easily adjusted with CSS properties.

Possible disadvantages of Flexbox Grid

  • Learning Curve
    Flexbox Grid requires understanding Flexbox principles, which can be challenging for beginners who are not familiar with CSS Flexbox.
  • Limited Older Browser Support
    Older browsers may not fully support Flexbox properties, potentially creating issues in layout rendering.
  • Performance Overhead
    Using a grid framework can introduce additional performance overhead compared to custom CSS solutions tailored to specific needs.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a grid system like Flexbox Grid means adding a dependency to your project, possibly increasing maintenance concerns.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Flexbox Grid videos

No Flexbox Grid videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flexbox Grid and CrossBrowserTesting)
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flexbox Grid and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flexbox Grid and CrossBrowserTesting

Flexbox Grid Reviews

Top 5 Bootstrap Alternatives
The Flexbox Grid, as the name suggests, is a grid system based on the CSS Flexbox properties. However, unlike the CSS technique, all the complexity is nicely abstracted away so that you focus only on placing elements the way you want. The best part is that all the code and class names mimic what you’d want in Bootstrap 4, which means switching between these two tools...
Source: geekflare.com

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Flexbox Grid might be a bit more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. We know about 7 links to it since March 2021 and only 6 links to CrossBrowserTesting. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flexbox Grid mentions (7)

  • I'm currently in the interview process for a Jr. Full Stack Developer position, and I was given this take-home test that has me on the verge of pulling my hair out.
    Not that everyone is the same but here's what I would do. 1) Start with how the data is organized by using Postman to fetch the JSON because they will give me an idea of the kind of data and how I should interact 2) Then proceed to the things I don't know well. In my case, Tabindexes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/tabindex Aria-labels:... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Why is tailwind so hyped?
    May you provide a specific scenario? A decade old 960gs provide a custom grid that could be easily tuned to any "proportion of the screen". Random super minimalistic http://flexboxgrid.com/ from the 10 seconds google search had a flex-basis param that could tune grid on the fly. Every other modern "flex css grid framework" has mediaqueries and basic components slapped on top. Barebones grid and flexbox provide... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Tailwind is now the most popular CSS framework in NPM
    Here is a great CSS library that is just the column system. http://flexboxgrid.com/ It has the same naming as bootstrap. I personally just use flex and grid since it so powerful I have no need for a grid system. I just use grid template columns and then flex for pretty much everything else. Tis is why I love Tailwind CSS. It so much more powerful it has all the break points for you and then just lets you get to... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Massive use of div containers in Yelp.com: is that really necessary?
    If it helps this is my go-to flex grid system when I start a new project. I usually build the big blocks using the utility classes provided by flexboxgrid (which is percentage-based), and then go in each component and fine tune each one. I also extended it a little bit to cover some uses cases that I felt it missed. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to use this bootstrap grid alternative?
    Did you check out it's documentation? http://flexboxgrid.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flexbox Grid and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

FlexboxPatterns - Build awesome user interfaces with CSS flexbox

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Simple Grid - Responsive & lightweight CSS grid for your website.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Lucas Gruwez - 🏊 + ⛵️ + 👨‍💻 | 🇦🇺 ↔️ 🇧🇪

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.