Crisp Chat VS Coq

Crisp Chat Reviews

Coq Reviews

Crisp Chat mentions (7)

• Looking for feedback on our landing page

  If I were to land on this page I would not trust the site. You can think about adding a live chat (Crisp) or an AI live chat (Wavechat) to boost your visitors trust in your site. Source: 11 months ago

• Which is your favorite online tool you've used to build your SaaS business?

  Crisp - Live chat + help desk articles. Really lightweight and have a generous free plan. Source: about 1 year ago

• What live chat solution do you use? Looking for as many replies as possible

  I saw https://crisp.chat/en/ grow up in front of my eyes. Haha. The founder is very nice and now they have such a nice, large company. Source: about 1 year ago

• If you run a one-person business, what are the issues you're battling with?

  My SaaS is more pro-consumer/b-to-c so the closest thing I use to a CRM is https://crisp.chat/en/ i. Source: over 1 year ago

• How long did it take your business to see a positive revenue?

  If you want to go with the profit model, try these steps 1. Reduce costs with automation (Bardeen) and freelancers (Upwork) 2. Increase site conversion with chatbots (Crisp) and email capture (Popupsmart) 3. Increase LTV with better feature adoption (Loopd in). Source: almost 2 years ago

Coq mentions (46)

• The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation

  Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong

  Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?

  Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago

• Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8

  Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 12 months ago

• Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs

  This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago