A Great Community: Both Tailwind CSS and Material Tailwind benefit from active communities, ensuring consistent updates, a wide range of plugins, and abundant resources. Material Tailwind is also a product of the popular Creative Tim company, well-known for its high-quality design tools and resources. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

Except that sorts the list in reverse: https://tio.run/##Vc6xDsIwDATQPV9xYyJ5od2Qyo9UGYhIwFXkVlY68PUhKSDEctb5Lbc9y2OVsdZbTAh7CDlacWcDpFXBYIFe5R5tjtLgkLctP2P6U4ATZF48Lu2w/35xNOoy9aBem2ksuwrE5Gk@0UAjDd5sylLsZ1F2rtYX (Also a subtle off-by-one error, it should be 0 to |n|-1 and I to |n|-1.). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

How is this different from Try It Online https://tio.run ? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Given your PL interpreters are written in Python, why not just share them as Python programs, optionally bundled with CPython? Are you concerned abput having a CPython dependency? PLs like Scala or Kotlin or Clojure depend on a backend (JVM, JS), so why not your PL? Or is the issue absolute simplicity? In which case, I suggest aiming at making it available via an online evaluator such as tio.run -- which boils... Source: over 2 years ago

TIO is actually quite good for that, even if it's more commonly associated with code golf. https://tio.run/. Source: over 2 years ago

Try It Online[0] seems to offer a very similar service - if you don't care about the collaboration aspect of it. It claims to be self-hostable[1]. glot.io[2] is another, which seems to fit more in the realm of "pastebin with runnable snippets". As I understand it, a big sell of repl.it is that they have some kind of collaborative editing support, which none of the alternatives I was able to find in a few minutes... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago