Try It Online (TIO) VS Browxy

Try It Online (TIO) mentions (23)

• Coding Is Hard

  Except that sorts the list in reverse: https://tio.run/##Vc6xDsIwDATQPV9xYyJ5od2Qyo9UGYhIwFXkVlY68PUhKSDEctb5Lbc9y2OVsdZbTAh7CDlacWcDpFXBYIFe5R5tjtLgkLctP2P6U4ATZF48Lu2w/35xNOoy9aBem2ksuwrE5Gk@0UAjDd5sylLsZ1F2rtYX (Also a subtle off-by-one error, it should be 0 to |n|-1 and I to |n|-1.). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Show HN: Particles – the URL contains the whole program code

  How is this different from Try It Online https://tio.run ? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• What to use.

  Given your PL interpreters are written in Python, why not just share them as Python programs, optionally bundled with CPython? Are you concerned abput having a CPython dependency? PLs like Scala or Kotlin or Clojure depend on a backend (JVM, JS), so why not your PL? Or is the issue absolute simplicity? In which case, I suggest aiming at making it available via an online evaluator such as tio.run -- which boils... Source: about 2 years ago

• New Comp Sci student learning C needs help with simple program

  TIO is actually quite good for that, even if it's more commonly associated with code golf. https://tio.run/. Source: over 2 years ago

• Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project

  Try It Online[0] seems to offer a very similar service - if you don't care about the collaboration aspect of it. It claims to be self-hostable[1]. glot.io[2] is another, which seems to fit more in the realm of "pastebin with runnable snippets". As I understand it, a big sell of repl.it is that they have some kind of collaborative editing support, which none of the alternatives I was able to find in a few minutes... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Browxy mentions (0)