Coverity Scan Reviews

Reviewable Reviews

Coverity Scan mentions (4)

• I created this point of sale system for restaurants and hospitality. The All-In-One has a 15.6" touchscreen running a Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4L and is made by Chipsee in Bejing, China. I'm helping a friend install it in a restaurant on the St. Lawrence River where he is the Executive Chef.

  You can use Coverity for free on open source code. I use it on an app I open sourced for packet processing. https://scan.coverity.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Scan.coverity.com — Static code analysis for Java, C/C++, C# and JavaScript, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

• CDN dollar just hit 6 year high.

  I personally remember Coverity Scan being completely offline for like 6 months while they tried to deal with infrastructure abuse from people mining bitcoin on their computing clusters. Source: about 3 years ago

• GCC 10.3 has been released

  > Does anyone know any good static analysers other than gcc's or clang's? Visual C++ as well, because since the XP SP2 issues, Microsoft has come up with SAL, which you can also use on your own code, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/using-sal-annotations-to-reduce-c-cpp-code-defects?view=msvc-160 Then specialized tooling just for this purpose, just two examples, https://scan.coverity.com/... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Reviewable mentions (21)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation

  Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Software Engineering at Google

  Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?

  The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub

  >See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago