Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Parasoft C/C++test VS Cppcheck

Compare Parasoft C/C++test VS Cppcheck and see what are their differences

Parasoft C/C++test logo Parasoft C/C++test

Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

Cppcheck logo Cppcheck

Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.
  • Parasoft C/C++test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Cppcheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Parasoft C/C++test features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Parasoft C/C++test offers a wide array of testing and analysis tools, including static code analysis, unit testing, and coverage analysis, providing a robust environment for identifying and fixing issues early in the development process.
  • Automated Testing
    It supports automated testing, which helps in consistent execution of tests and allows developers to integrate testing into their continuous integration pipelines seamlessly.
  • Compliance with Standards
    The tool supports compliance with industry standards such as MISRA, CERT, and AUTOSAR, making it suitable for projects that require adherence to specific coding guidelines.
  • Integration with Development Environments
    Parasoft C/C++test easily integrates with popular development environments and build systems, enhancing the workflow without requiring major changes to existing processes.
  • Detailed Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and dashboards that offer insights into code quality, test coverage, and compliance, aiding in better decision making and prioritization.

Possible disadvantages of Parasoft C/C++test

  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive features, the tool can be complex to set up and configure, especially for teams that are new to using such an extensive testing suite.
  • Cost
    Parasoft C/C++test can be expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or startups with limited budgets looking for cost-effective solutions.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find that there is a steep learning curve due to the tool's extensive functionality and features, requiring time and resources for training.
  • Performance Overhead
    When performing comprehensive analysis and testing, the tool might introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down the development pipeline.
  • Customization Limitations
    While the tool provides extensive functionalities, some users might find it lacks customization options for specific use cases or integrated workflows.

Cppcheck features and specs

  • Open Source
    Cppcheck is open-source software, which means it is free to use and its source code is available for modification and distribution under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
  • Static Analysis
    Cppcheck excels at performing static code analysis, detecting bugs, memory leaks, and potential issues in C and C++ code without executing the program.
  • Wide Platform Support
    Cppcheck supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it versatile and accessible to developers on different operating systems.
  • Integrated with IDEs
    Cppcheck can be integrated with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Visual Studio, Eclipse, and Code::Blocks, providing seamless code analysis during development.
  • Customizable
    Cppcheck allows customization of its analysis through command-line options and configurations, enabling users to tailor the tool to their specific needs and project requirements.
  • Extensive Reporting
    Cppcheck provides detailed reports that highlight various types of issues, making it easier for developers to identify and resolve problems efficiently.
  • Regular Updates
    Cppcheck is actively maintained, with regular updates and improvements that enhance its capabilities and address any newly discovered issues.

Possible disadvantages of Cppcheck

  • False Positives
    Cppcheck may sometimes produce false positives, flagging issues that are not actually problematic, which can lead to unnecessary debugging efforts.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may encounter a learning curve when first using Cppcheck, as they need to understand its configuration options and how to interpret its output effectively.
  • Limited Dynamic Analysis
    Cppcheck focuses on static analysis and does not provide dynamic analysis capabilities, which means it cannot detect issues that only occur at runtime.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Cppcheck on large codebases can introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down the development process if not managed properly.
  • Complex Configuration
    For complex projects, configuring Cppcheck to ignore certain false positives or to focus on specific types of issues can be challenging and time-consuming.

Parasoft C/C++test videos

Parasoft C/C++test

More videos:

  • Review - Parasoft C/C++test for Embedded Development

Cppcheck videos

Cppcheck

More videos:

  • Review - Daniel Marjamäki: Cppcheck, static code analysis

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parasoft C/C++test and Cppcheck)
Code Analysis
33 33%
67% 67
Code Coverage
32 32%
68% 68
Code Review
29 29%
71% 71
Development
45 45%
55% 55

User comments

Share your experience with using Parasoft C/C++test and Cppcheck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Parasoft C/C++test and Cppcheck

Parasoft C/C++test Reviews

We have no reviews of Parasoft C/C++test yet.
Be the first one to post

Cppcheck Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Cppcheck is a popular, open-source, free, cross-platform static code analysis tool dedicated to C and C++. It is known for being easy to use and its simplicity is one of its pros. To get started with it you don’t have to do any adjustments or modifications, which is why it’s often recommended for beginners. It also has a reputation of reporting a relatively small number of...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Parasoft C/C++test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Parasoft C/C++test yet. Tracking of Parasoft C/C++test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Cppcheck mentions (10)

  • Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
    I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Enforcing Memory Safety?
    Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Static Code analysis
    For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?
    Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types
    Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parasoft C/C++test and Cppcheck, you can also consider the following products

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Polyspace - Polyspace is a suite of static code analysis products developed by Matlab to help software developers, QA Testers, and engineers find critical problems in their code and fix them before they become a serious threat.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.

PVS-Studio - PVS-Studio is a useful piece of software for detecting problems in source code. The software examines program codes written in C, C++, and C# for any problems that might prohibit the code from functioning properly.