Checkmarx
SonarQube
Coverity Scan
Veracode
Appknox
Netsparker
HCL AppScan
Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
Parasoft C/C++test
PVS-Studio
lgtm.com
Polyspace
Checkmarx CppcheckBased on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Checkmarx. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, or Snyk can automate parts of this process by scanning for known vulnerability patterns. While white box testing may not reflect real-world attack scenarios (as attackers rarely access source code), it provides the most thorough assessment of security posture. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
Automate security testing: Use tools such as OWASP ZAP, SonarQube, or Checkmarx to automate security testing. This will help you identify security issues early in the development process and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities being introduced into your code. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Application Security (AppSec) is the forte of Checkmarx, which is an award-winning AppSec Testing tool that integrates security policies into the DevOps workflow and ensures security across the application lifecycle. Checkmarx scans all your code and provides actionable insights for critical vulnerabilities. Checkmarx also offers developer-friendly AppSec training that makes the transition to DevSecOps more... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: almost 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.
Appknox - Appknox is a cloud-based mobile app security solution to detect threats and vulnerabilities in the app.
Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.