Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS Apache Avro

Compare Control-M VS Apache Avro and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Apache Avro logo Apache Avro

Apache Avro is a comprehensive data serialization system and acting as a source of data exchanger service for Apache Hadoop.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Apache Avro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-21

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Apache Avro features and specs

  • Schema Evolution
    Avro supports seamless schema evolution, allowing you to add fields and change data types without impacting existing data. This flexibility is advantageous in environments where data structures frequently change.
  • Compact Binary Format
    Avro uses a compact binary format for data serialization, leading to efficient storage and faster data transmission compared to text-based formats like JSON or XML.
  • Language Agnostic
    Avro is designed to be language agnostic, with support for multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, C++, and more. This makes it easier to integrate with various systems.
  • No Code Generation Required
    Unlike other serialization frameworks such as Protocol Buffers and Thrift, Avro does not require generating code from the schema, simplifying the development process.
  • Self Describing
    Each Avro data file contains its schema, making the data self-describing. This helps maintain consistency between data producers and consumers.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Avro

  • Lack of Human Readability
    Avro's binary format is not human-readable, making it challenging to debug or inspect data without specialized tools.
  • Schema Management Overhead
    While Avro supports schema evolution, managing and maintaining these schemas across multiple services can become complex and require additional coordination.
  • Limited Support for Complex Data Types
    Avro has limitations when it comes to the representation of certain complex data types, which might necessitate workarounds or transformations that add complexity.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who are new to Apache Avro may face a learning curve to understand schema creation, evolution, and integration within their data pipelines.
  • Dependency on Schema Registry
    Using Avro effectively often requires integrating with a schema registry, adding an extra layer of infrastructure and potential points of failure.

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Apache Avro videos

CCA 175 : Apache Avro Introduction

More videos:

  • Review - End to end Data Governance with Apache Avro and Atlas

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and Apache Avro)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and Apache Avro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and Apache Avro

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Apache Avro Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Avro yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Avro seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Avro mentions (14)

  • Pulumi Gestalt 0.0.1 released
    A schema.json converter for easier ingestion (likely supporting Avro and Protobuf). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Why Data Security is Broken and How to Fix it?
    Security Aware Data Metadata Data schema formats such as Avro and Json currently lack built-in support for data sensitivity or security-aware metadata. Additionally, common formats like Parquet and Iceberg, while efficient for storing large datasets, don’t natively include security-aware metadata. At Jarrid, we are exploring various metadata formats to incorporate data sensitivity and security-aware attributes... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Open Table Formats Such as Apache Iceberg Are Inevitable for Analytical Data
    Apache AVRO [1] is one but it has been largely replaced by Parquet [2] which is a hybrid row/columnar format [1] https://avro.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Generating Avro Schemas from Go types
    The most common format for describing schema in this scenario is Apache Avro. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • gRPC on the client side
    Other serialization alternatives have a schema validation option: e.g., Avro, Kryo and Protocol Buffers. Interestingly enough, gRPC uses Protobuf to offer RPC across distributed components:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and Apache Avro, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Apache Ambari - Ambari is aimed at making Hadoop management simpler by developing software for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Hadoop clusters.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Apache HBase - Apache HBase – Apache HBase™ Home

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Apache Pig - Pig is a high-level platform for creating MapReduce programs used with Hadoop.