Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Ambari VS Control-M

Compare Apache Ambari VS Control-M and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Ambari logo Apache Ambari

Ambari is aimed at making Hadoop management simpler by developing software for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Hadoop clusters.

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • Apache Ambari Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-08
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Apache Ambari features and specs

  • Centralized Management
    Apache Ambari provides a centralized platform to manage, monitor, and provision Hadoop clusters efficiently. This feature simplifies the administration tasks by offering a single interface for managing cluster operations.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Ambari offers a graphical user interface (GUI) that is intuitive and easy to use, enabling administrators to manage clusters without requiring extensive command-line knowledge.
  • Automated Installation
    It supports automated installation and configuration of Hadoop components, reducing the complexity and time required to set up a cluster.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    Ambari provides real-time insights into cluster health and performance through a variety of metrics and dashboards, allowing for proactive management.
  • Extensibility
    The platform is designed to be extensible, allowing developers to write custom alerts and metrics, thus adapting the system to meet specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ambari

  • Resource Intensive
    Ambari can consume significant system resources, especially in larger clusters, which could impact performance if resources are not adequately provisioned.
  • Limited Support for Non-Hadoop Ecosystems
    The primary focus of Apache Ambari is on Hadoop ecosystems, and it lacks extensive support for non-Hadoop big data technologies, which can limit its applicability in heterogeneous environments.
  • Complexity for Small Clusters
    For smaller Hadoop deployments, the use of Ambari might be overkill and add unnecessary complexity due to its comprehensive nature.
  • Dependency on Updates
    Users can encounter compatibility issues or bugs following updates, which can require troubleshooting and delay important operations.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Customization
    While it is extensible, customization in Ambari can have a steep learning curve, demanding deeper technical knowledge to implement specific configurations or custom components.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Apache Ambari videos

No Apache Ambari videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ambari and Control-M)
Data Dashboard
100 100%
0% 0
IT Automation
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ambari and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Ambari and Control-M

Apache Ambari Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Ambari yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ambari seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ambari mentions (1)

  • In One Minute : Hadoop
    Ambari, A web-based tool for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Apache Hadoop clusters which includes support for Hadoop HDFS, Hadoop MapReduce, Hive, HCatalog, HBase, ZooKeeper, Oozie, Pig and Sqoop. Ambari also provides a dashboard for viewing cluster health such as heatmaps and ability to view MapReduce, Pig and Hive applications visually along with features to diagnose their performance characteristics in... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ambari and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

Apache Pig - Pig is a high-level platform for creating MapReduce programs used with Hadoop.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Apache HBase - Apache HBase – Apache HBase™ Home

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Apache Mahout - Distributed Linear Algebra

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions