Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache HBase VS Control-M

Compare Apache HBase VS Control-M and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache HBase logo Apache HBase

Apache HBase – Apache HBase™ Home

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • Apache HBase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Apache HBase features and specs

  • Scalability
    HBase is designed to scale horizontally, allowing it to handle large amounts of data by adding more nodes. This makes it suitable for applications requiring high write and read throughput.
  • Consistency
    It provides strong consistency for reads and writes, which ensures that any read will return the most recently written value. This is crucial for applications where data accuracy is essential.
  • Integration with Hadoop Ecosystem
    HBase integrates seamlessly with Hadoop and other components like Apache Hive and Apache Pig, making it a suitable choice for big data processing tasks.
  • Random Read/Write Access
    Unlike HDFS, HBase supports random, real-time read/write access to large datasets, making it ideal for applications that need frequent data updates.
  • Schema Flexibility
    HBase provides a flexible schema model that allows changes on demand without major disruptions, supporting dynamic and evolving data models.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HBase

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing HBase can be complex and may require expert knowledge, especially for tuning and optimizing performance in large-scale deployments.
  • High Latency for Small Queries
    While HBase is designed for large-scale data, small queries can suffer from higher latency due to the overhead of its distributed nature.
  • Sparse Documentation
    Despite being widely used, HBase documentation and community support can sometimes be lacking, making issue resolution difficult for new users.
  • Dependency on Hadoop
    Since HBase depends heavily on the Hadoop ecosystem, issues or limitations with Hadoop components can affect HBase’s performance and functionality.
  • Limited Transaction Support
    HBase lacks full ACID transaction support, which can be a limitation for applications needing complex transactional processing.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Apache HBase videos

+ Add

Apache HBase 101: How HBase Can Help You Build Scalable, Distributed Java Applications

Control-M videos

+ Add

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HBase and Control-M)

Apache HBase

Control-M

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
IT Automation
0 0%
IT Automation
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HBase and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache HBase and Control-M

Apache HBase Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache HBase yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HBase seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HBase mentions (8)

View more

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HBase and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

Apache Ambari - Ambari is aimed at making Hadoop management simpler by developing software for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Hadoop clusters.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Apache Pig - Pig is a high-level platform for creating MapReduce programs used with Hadoop.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Apache Cassandra - The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Loading...