Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CommitTasks VS RunsOn

Compare CommitTasks VS RunsOn and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CommitTasks logo CommitTasks

A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

RunsOn logo RunsOn

Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.
  • CommitTasks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06
  • RunsOn 10x cheaper GitHub Action runners
    10x cheaper GitHub Action runners //
    2024-01-23
  • RunsOn Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub
    Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub //
    2024-01-23

Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.

RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.

Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.

We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.

CommitTasks

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

RunsOn

$ Details
freemium €300.0 / Annually
Platforms
AWS GitHub
Release Date
2024 January

CommitTasks features and specs

  • Task Management Integration
    CommitTasks allows users to integrate task management into their git workflow by embedding tasks directly into commit messages. This can enhance productivity by simultaneously tracking coding and task completion.
  • Visibility
    The tool makes it easy to track task progress since tasks are displayed in the version control history, providing clear visibility of what has been completed with each commit.
  • Developer-Focused
    CommitTasks is designed specifically for developers who are familiar with Git, providing an intuitive way to manage tasks without leaving their development environment.
  • Automation
    It automates the process of task tracking by updating the task's status once a commit is made, reducing the need for manual updates.

Possible disadvantages of CommitTasks

  • Learning Curve
    Users may face a learning curve as they get familiar with embedding tasks in commit messages, especially if they are not already accustomed to using Git extensively.
  • Limited to Git Commits
    The tool's functionality is tied to commit messages, meaning that tasks not associated with a specific commit aren't easily tracked within the tool.
  • Not Suitable for Non-Developers
    Non-developers or teams using other version control systems might find it difficult to integrate this tool into their existing workflows.
  • No Native Collaboration Features
    CommitTasks does not include built-in collaboration tools like shared task boards or team notifications, potentially limiting its use in team environments.

RunsOn features and specs

  • Ephemeral self-hosted runners
  • Autoscaling
  • Pricing
    10x cheaper than competition

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CommitTasks and RunsOn)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
23 23%
77% 77
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
GitHub
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing CommitTasks and RunsOn.

What makes your product unique?

RunsOn's answer:

10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

RunsOn's answer:

Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.

How would you describe your primary audience?

RunsOn's answer:

CTO / Senior developers

What's the story behind your product?

RunsOn's answer:

Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.

User comments

Share your experience with using CommitTasks and RunsOn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RunsOn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CommitTasks mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CommitTasks yet. Tracking of CommitTasks recommendations started around Mar 2021.

RunsOn mentions (6)

  • Managed, self-hosted Arm runners for GitHub Actions using AWS Graviton Processors
    RunsOn is a self-hosted runner manager for GitHub Actions that you can install in your own AWS account. It will automatically spawn EC2 VMs as self-hosted runners for your GitHub Actions workflows. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: What are you working on (August 2024)?
    I'm working on https://runs-on.com, a self-hosted solution to get 10x cheaper GitHub Actions runners with support for Linux x64 and arm64. This month I've been refining Windows support and hopefully this gets fully shipped before Aug 31st! - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Ask HN: Any CI/CD SaaS Solutions for ARM?
    You could also be interested in https://runs-on.com. Must be installed in your AWS account (1-click cloudformation template), and then you can use any instance type offered by AWS. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • GitHub now provides Arm-based runners
    > We were using self-hosted runners which were not as efficient as we thought so we spawned EC2 instances and connected them to the github network to be runners, but we had such an amount of issues that we wanted to go back to non-self hosted For those hitting that same kind of issue (and you are many), you should check out my product https://runs-on.com. 1-click install, 1-click upgrades, and from 7x to 16x... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Making EC2 boot time 8x faster
    > while we can boot the Actions runner within 5 seconds of a job starting, it can take GitHub 10+ seconds to actually deliver that job to the runner This. I went the same route with regards to boot time optimisations for [1] (cleaning up the AMI, cloud-init, etc.), and can boot a VM from cold in 15s (I can't rely on prewarming pools of machines -- even stopped -- since RunsOn doesn't share machines with multiple... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CommitTasks and RunsOn, you can also consider the following products

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

BuildJet for GitHub Actions - We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.

Commit Together by Github - Now add co-authors to your commits

Cirun.io - GitHub Actions on your Cloud!

Datree.io - GitOps policy engine

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production