Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Commit Together by Github VS HTTP Toolkit

Compare Commit Together by Github VS HTTP Toolkit and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

HTTP Toolkit logo HTTP Toolkit

Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • HTTP Toolkit
    Image date //
    2024-11-03

Commit Together by Github

Website
github.blog
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Edit details

HTTP Toolkit

Website
httptoolkit.com
Pricing URL
Official HTTP Toolkit Pricing
$ Details
freemium €7.0 / Monthly (for a Pro subscription)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Cross Platform GraphQL API JavaScript Android iOS Docker
Startup details
Country
Spain
State
Barcelona
City
Barcelona
Founder(s)
Tim Perry
Employees
1 - 9
Edit details

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

HTTP Toolkit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    HTTP Toolkit provides a user-friendly interface that makes it simple for developers to intercept, view, and debug HTTP traffic without needing extensive setup or configuration.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    HTTP Toolkit is available on multiple platforms (Windows, macOS, and Linux), ensuring a broad usability across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, HTTP Toolkit allows for community contributions and transparency. Developers can inspect, modify, and enhance the tool to better suit their needs.
  • Comprehensive Debugging Features
    It allows for detailed analysis of HTTP requests and responses, including the ability to edit live traffic, simulating various networking conditions, and automatically retrying requests.
  • Integrations and Plugins
    HTTP Toolkit supports a range of common integrations and plugins for popular tools and services, which helps extend its functionality seamlessly.
  • SSL & HTTPS Support
    Has robust support for SSL and HTTPS, allowing for the interception and debugging of secure traffic in a straightforward manner.

Analysis of HTTP Toolkit

Overall verdict

  • HTTP Toolkit is highly regarded in the developer community for its combination of ease of use and advanced debugging capabilities, making it an excellent choice for developers looking to understand and fine-tune their HTTP(S) traffic.

Why this product is good

  • HTTP Toolkit is praised for its user-friendly interface and robust features designed to intercept, view, and debug HTTP(S) traffic. It offers automatic setup for many platforms, which makes it accessible even to those with limited experience in network debugging. Additionally, it supports a wide range of platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android, making it a versatile tool for developers working on different systems. The tool also provides powerful inspection capabilities, allowing users to explore the full context of each HTTP request or response, including headers, cookies, and bodies.

Recommended for

  • Developers needing to debug and modify HTTP/S requests and responses
  • QA professionals seeking a reliable way to test API interactions
  • Individuals or teams working on full-stack development who need to analyze backend and frontend interactions
  • Students learning about networking who require tools to visualize and understand HTTP(S) traffic

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

HTTP Toolkit videos

+ Add

HTTP Toolkit Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and HTTP Toolkit)

Commit Together by Github

HTTP Toolkit

Developer Tools
24 24%
Developer Tools
76% 76
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
Proxy
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
User Experience
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and HTTP Toolkit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Commit Together by Github and HTTP Toolkit

Commit Together by Github Reviews

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet.
Be the first one to post

HTTP Toolkit Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
HTTP ToolKit is an open-source tool for debugging. It works with the three main OS and has good features attached to it. Just with a click, it can intercept and view all your HTTP(s). Compared to others, it targets interception of HTTP and HTTPS automatically from clients, with the inclusion of Android applications and browsers, desktop browsers, backend, and scripting...
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
HTTP Toolkit supports standard HTTP debugger features including breakpoints & rewriting HTTP(S) traffic, filtering and searching collected traffic, and highlighting & autoformatting for many popular request & response body formats. Core features to intercept, inspect & rewrite HTTP(S) are all available for free, while some advanced premium features like import/export and...
Source: geekflare.com
Best Postman Alternatives: Fastest API Testing Tools
For debugging, testing, and building APIs with HTTPs, you can effectively use HTTP Toolkit because it is built for this purpose. Also, this is the reason why it is known as a good Postman alternative for various purposes.
Source: www.pcstacks.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP Toolkit seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 26 links to HTTP Toolkit, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

HTTP Toolkit mentions (26)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and HTTP Toolkit, you can also consider the following products

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

mitmproxy - mitmproxy is an SSL-capable man-in-the-middle proxy for HTTP.

Loading...