Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Commit Together by Github VS Hetzner Object Storage

Compare Commit Together by Github VS Hetzner Object Storage and see what are their differences

KeywordSearch
Supercharge your Ad audiences with AI featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Hetzner Object Storage logo Hetzner Object Storage

Scalable object storage, S3-compatible and ideal for growing data volumes. Secure and flexible for efficient data storage.
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
Not present

Object Storage is the S3-compatible storage solution that grows with any data requirements – secure, flexible and accessible via API. Object Storage offers the ideal solution for managing data-intensive workloads e.g. for backups, multimedia or big data. In contrast to conventional storage solutions, data is organized as objects consisting of the data itself, the metadata and a unique ID. This structure makes it easy to manage the data, search through it and organize it, and is particularly suitable for large, unstructured amounts of data. As a data center operator and hosting provider headquartered in Germany, data protection is a top priority at Hetzner. Thanks to strict compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), customers benefit from the highest security standards and best practices.

Commit Together by Github

Website
github.blog
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Hetzner Object Storage

Website
hetzner.com
Pricing URL
Official Hetzner Object Storage Pricing
$ Details
paid €5.94 / Monthly (per TB)
Release Date
2024 December
Edit details

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Hetzner Object Storage features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and Hetzner Object Storage)

Commit Together by Github

Hetzner Object Storage

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Hetzner Object Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Hetzner Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hetzner Object Storage yet. Tracking of Hetzner Object Storage recommendations started around Apr 2025.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and Hetzner Object Storage, you can also consider the following products

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

IONOS Object Storage - IONOS Object Storage is a convenient, affordable and compliant way to store any amount of static company data. Pay only for what you use.

Loading...