Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Co-commit VS HTTP Toolkit

Compare Co-commit VS HTTP Toolkit and see what are their differences

Co-commit logo Co-commit

Co-author commits on GitHub when pair programming.

HTTP Toolkit logo HTTP Toolkit

Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.
  • Co-commit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • HTTP Toolkit
    Image date //
    2024-11-03

Co-commit

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-

HTTP Toolkit

$ Details
freemium €7.0 / Monthly (for a Pro subscription)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Cross Platform GraphQL API JavaScript Android iOS Docker
Startup details
Country
Spain
State
Barcelona
City
Barcelona
Founder(s)
Tim Perry
Employees
1 - 9

Co-commit features and specs

  • Collaboration Enhancement
    Co-commit allows multiple contributors to be credited in a single commit, making collaboration more transparent and acknowledging all participants' efforts.
  • Improved Attribution
    By supporting co-authorship, it ensures proper attribution of work, which can encourage more contributions and foster a healthier project environment.
  • Better History Tracking
    Having multiple authors listed on a commit can provide clearer insights into who contributed to a particular piece of code, enhancing project documentation and accountability.

Possible disadvantages of Co-commit

  • Complexity in Git Management
    Introducing co-authors in commits might complicate git history management for those unfamiliar with the feature, potentially leading to confusion.
  • Limited Adoption
    As it's dependent on using specific tooling for co-author management, its benefits might be limited if not widely adopted across a team or project.
  • Tool Dependency
    Relying on an additional tool introduces dependency, which may not be ideal for projects aiming for minimal external dependencies or those with strict toolchain policies.

HTTP Toolkit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    HTTP Toolkit provides a user-friendly interface that makes it simple for developers to intercept, view, and debug HTTP traffic without needing extensive setup or configuration.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    HTTP Toolkit is available on multiple platforms (Windows, macOS, and Linux), ensuring a broad usability across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, HTTP Toolkit allows for community contributions and transparency. Developers can inspect, modify, and enhance the tool to better suit their needs.
  • Comprehensive Debugging Features
    It allows for detailed analysis of HTTP requests and responses, including the ability to edit live traffic, simulating various networking conditions, and automatically retrying requests.
  • Integrations and Plugins
    HTTP Toolkit supports a range of common integrations and plugins for popular tools and services, which helps extend its functionality seamlessly.
  • SSL & HTTPS Support
    Has robust support for SSL and HTTPS, allowing for the interception and debugging of secure traffic in a straightforward manner.

Analysis of HTTP Toolkit

Overall verdict

  • HTTP Toolkit is highly regarded in the developer community for its combination of ease of use and advanced debugging capabilities, making it an excellent choice for developers looking to understand and fine-tune their HTTP(S) traffic.

Why this product is good

  • HTTP Toolkit is praised for its user-friendly interface and robust features designed to intercept, view, and debug HTTP(S) traffic. It offers automatic setup for many platforms, which makes it accessible even to those with limited experience in network debugging. Additionally, it supports a wide range of platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android, making it a versatile tool for developers working on different systems. The tool also provides powerful inspection capabilities, allowing users to explore the full context of each HTTP request or response, including headers, cookies, and bodies.

Recommended for

  • Developers needing to debug and modify HTTP/S requests and responses
  • QA professionals seeking a reliable way to test API interactions
  • Individuals or teams working on full-stack development who need to analyze backend and frontend interactions
  • Students learning about networking who require tools to visualize and understand HTTP(S) traffic

Co-commit videos

No Co-commit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

HTTP Toolkit videos

HTTP Toolkit Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Co-commit and HTTP Toolkit)
Developer Tools
14 14%
86% 86
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
100% 100
Software Development
27 27%
73% 73

User comments

Share your experience with using Co-commit and HTTP Toolkit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Co-commit and HTTP Toolkit

Co-commit Reviews

We have no reviews of Co-commit yet.
Be the first one to post

HTTP Toolkit Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
HTTP ToolKit is an open-source tool for debugging. It works with the three main OS and has good features attached to it. Just with a click, it can intercept and view all your HTTP(s). Compared to others, it targets interception of HTTP and HTTPS automatically from clients, with the inclusion of Android applications and browsers, desktop browsers, backend, and scripting...
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
HTTP Toolkit supports standard HTTP debugger features including breakpoints & rewriting HTTP(S) traffic, filtering and searching collected traffic, and highlighting & autoformatting for many popular request & response body formats. Core features to intercept, inspect & rewrite HTTP(S) are all available for free, while some advanced premium features like import/export and...
Source: geekflare.com
Best Postman Alternatives: Fastest API Testing Tools
For debugging, testing, and building APIs with HTTPs, you can effectively use HTTP Toolkit because it is built for this purpose. Also, this is the reason why it is known as a good Postman alternative for various purposes.
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP Toolkit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Co-commit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Co-commit yet. Tracking of Co-commit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP Toolkit mentions (26)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Co-commit and HTTP Toolkit, you can also consider the following products

USE Together - Collaborative screen sharing with multiple mouse cursors

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Tuple - Tuple is a Mac-only remote pair programming tool for discerning developers

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Commit Together by Github - Now add co-authors to your commits

mitmproxy - mitmproxy is an SSL-capable man-in-the-middle proxy for HTTP.