Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cirrus CSS VS mini.css

Compare Cirrus CSS VS mini.css and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Cirrus CSS logo Cirrus CSS

The SCSS framework for the modern web. It's component based, customizable, and completely open source.

mini.css logo mini.css

Responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
  • Cirrus CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03

Cirrus is a modular, responsive, and component centric SCSS framework aimed at bringing beautiful, hassle-free styling. Cirrus works right away with minimal styling. From there, add components and tweak using utility classes to make it truly your own.

  • mini.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-11

Cirrus CSS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Cirrus CSS is designed to be lightweight, meaning it doesn't add a lot of overhead to your web project, which can result in faster loading times.
  • Responsive Design
    The framework includes responsive utilities that make it easier to create mobile-friendly designs with minimal effort.
  • Modern Look
    Cirrus offers a modern aesthetic with a collection of design elements that can give your project a contemporary appearance.
  • Ease of Use
    The framework is simple to set up and integrate into projects, allowing developers to get started quickly without extensive configuration.
  • Customization
    Cirrus CSS offers customization options that allow developers to tailor styles and designs to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Cirrus CSS

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation, Cirrus has a smaller user base and fewer community resources.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers familiar with other CSS frameworks, there may be a learning curve as they adjust to Cirrus's classes and utilities.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    As a smaller framework, Cirrus might not be compatible with some third-party plugins and components built for more widely-used frameworks.
  • Less Documentation
    Cirrus CSS may have fewer or less detailed documentation and tutorials compared to more established CSS frameworks.
  • Limited Features
    Some advanced features available in larger frameworks might be missing, which could be a drawback for projects requiring those capabilities.

mini.css features and specs

  • Lightweight
    mini.css is a minimal framework, which means it has a small file size and is optimized for fast loading times.
  • Responsive
    The framework is built with responsive design principles, ensuring that web applications look good on all device sizes.
  • Easy to Use
    mini.css offers a simplified class structure that makes it easy to implement without needing extensive documentation review.
  • Customizable
    Despite its minimal nature, mini.css offers customization options to adapt styles as per specific project requirements.
  • CSS-Only
    Being purely a CSS framework, it doesn't depend on JavaScript, making it a good choice for projects aiming for fast performance.

Possible disadvantages of mini.css

  • Limited Features
    Due to its minimalist design, mini.css might not provide as many components or utility classes as larger frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation.
  • Lack of JavaScript Components
    While the lack of JavaScript dependencies can be a benefit, it also means that dynamic components like modals and carousels need to be implemented separately.
  • Smaller Community
    mini.css has a smaller user base, which means less community support, fewer third-party resources, and extensions compared to more popular frameworks.
  • Limited Popularity
    Its limited popularity might result in fewer online tutorials and examples, potentially increasing the learning curve for new users.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cirrus CSS and mini.css)

Cirrus CSS

mini.css

CSS Framework
56 56%
CSS Framework
44% 44
Design Tools
52 52%
Design Tools
48% 48
Frontend Development
100 100%
Frontend Development
0% 0
Developer Tools
43 43%
Developer Tools
57% 57

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Cirrus CSS and mini.css.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Cirrus is possible thanks to open source contributors on Dart Sass and True (Sass unit testing framework).

What makes your product unique?

Cirrus CSS's answer

There are often debates on whether component-centric frameworks such as Bootstrap or atomic-classed frameworks such as Tailwind are better for its: - Learning curve - Maintainability - Flexibility - Ease of use

I am a fan of both frameworks as they have their strengths depending on the situation. With component-based frameworks, it is quite easy to slap a couple of different elements together and you have a working website. However, customization may require writing lots of other CSS yourself which takes time away from building your product. Utility-class-based frameworks offer customization that is as granular as it gets short of writing the CSS yourself but without the overhead. A major drawback is that being able to customize and use tree shaking requires direct integration of Tailwind into your project and a CDN version is not feasible for production.

Cirrus is a framework that takes the best parts of both of these types of frameworks and provides: - Many pre-built basic components to accelerate your development velocity (e.g. Avatars, Modals, Tabs, etc.). To keep your code clean, all component classes are built following the BEM convention. - A suite of common utility classes to help tweak and polish your designs when needed. These utility classes are so powerful that you can construct components with them alone. - Different CDN builds of the framework that can be dropped in at any browser (core, ext, all). Choose one that fits your needs.

With the release of 0.7, much of the framework can now be customized. Since the framework is written entirely in SCSS, it can take advantage of all the existing APIs for class generation. The new configuration system in Cirrus allows you to: - Add/Edit/Delete component styles. - Add/Edit/Delete utility classes. - Specify which breakpoints are supported. - Toggle which classes should have viewport variants (to help save on build size). - Enable/Disable different parts of the framework. - And more :)

What's the story behind your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Started in late 2016, Cirrus was built as a side project of mine to foray into web development. Since then it has grown immensely with the addition of components, more utility classes, CSS grid, etc. My main goal for this framework is to make web development as painless as possible -- and that always starts with great documentation and consistency in design choices.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cirrus CSS and mini.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cirrus CSS and mini.css

Cirrus CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Regarding its extensive suite of components, Cirrus not only provides base styles for page layouts but also a variety of different components. It works immediately with minimal styling. From there, you can add components and customize using utility classes to truly make it your own.
Source: coursesity.com

mini.css Reviews

We have no reviews of mini.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mini.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cirrus CSS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cirrus CSS yet. Tracking of Cirrus CSS recommendations started around Aug 2021.

mini.css mentions (1)

  • 23 Responsive And Lightweight CSS Frameworks
    Mini.css is cleaner’s lightweight CSS frameworks for creating websites that look beautiful on every device and load faster. It has a smaller size (under 10KB gzipped), along with the responsive grid and modern components that make sure all your users are satisfied and can access the website anytime, anywhere. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cirrus CSS and mini.css, you can also consider the following products

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Topcoat - TopCoat, TopWeb, Rheologic, Software for coating, drying, converting, web handling, industries.

Loading...