Cherokee VS Puma

Compare Cherokee VS Puma and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.

Landing page //
2023-01-25

Landing page //
2023-06-13

2019 Jeep Cherokee - Review & Road Test

Puma videos

+ Add

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cherokee and Puma)

Puma

Web Servers

75 75%

Web Servers

25% 25

Application Server

60 60%

Application Server

40% 40

Web And Application Servers

73 73%

Web And Application Servers

27% 27

Development Tools

100 100%

Development Tools

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cherokee and Puma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cherokee and Puma

Cherokee Reviews

We have no reviews of Cherokee yet.
Be the first one to post

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?

There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.

Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cherokee mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cherokee yet. Tracking of Cherokee recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Puma mentions (3)

Breaking the 300 barrier
As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
What's new in Ruby 3.1?
One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago