cheat.sh VS fish shell

Cheat.sh [0] has been a godsend when the man pages are too dense and I just want to use the tool and move on with my life. [0] http://cheat.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

I like what you're doing with this, never used cheat.sh before but had a little look around and great idea :) I've not tested everything, I seen something about find and thought I could help. Source: 11 months ago

Query http://cheat.sh for help with a command. Source: 12 months ago

Try cheat.sh perfect when your in the shell, working. Source: about 1 year ago

There is also the awesome resource - cheat.sh where you can get info about many programming languages, for example, to get info about PowerShell's Get-ChildItem command you can just issue a command curl cheat.sh/powershell/Get-ChildItem in your terminal or go to https://cht.sh/powershell/Get-ChildItem in your browser and get the following output:. Source: about 1 year ago

We're using bash as our terminal shell for now (it is standard in many distros) but it is not the only one out there. If you want to test out zsh, fish or oh-my-zsh, you will see that there are a few differences and the features are usually the main differentiator. Try that, poke around. Source: 5 months ago

Before actual update, confirm your shell is independent on python. It is important when you use fish:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

> As for why I don't think that's their goal, just look at https://fishshell.com/ not one of the listed features requires them to drop POSIX compatibility entirely. “Sensible scripting” is right there. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

This is the default behaviour of fish[1], by the way! [1]: https://fishshell.com. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Last suggestion? Give fish a go. Its amazing. https://fishshell.com/. Source: 10 months ago