Based on our record, Gitless should be more popular than cgit. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've been looking for a Git server that's simple enough for individuals to self-host and easy enough to use. It wasn't until I came across cgit (which is actually used on the official Linux kernel website) that I knew it was the one for me: https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/. Source: about 1 year ago
Can you believe some of us crazy people still do this? https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/ cgit is the git repo frontend for projects like wireguard https://undleadly.org has its source code in the sidebar for you to check out in C as well. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
You might be thinking of cgit: A hyperfast web frontend for git repositories written in C. Source: over 2 years ago
A more lightweight git https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/. Source: over 2 years ago
One such project is the Gitless initiative which has a Python wrapper around Git proper providing far-simpler workflows based on some solid research. Unfortunately it doesn't look like Gitless' Python codebase has had active development recently, which doesn't inspire much confidence. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
You and me both. Git's interface has been very hard for me to understand (especially coming from Mercurial). I ended up finding Gitless (https://gitless.com), a wrapper around Git with a better interface, and loving it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
> > To differentiate from Git Pijul should focus on usability... If Pijul has an easy to use interface like Mercurial did then that will massively help adoption. > I don't think the goal or differentiation of pijul is to be popular via good UI, though. If the theory of patches is good, it doesn't matter if pijul "wins" or not, as long as whatever does can integrate it. If the theory of patches is bad, I... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I'd like to think it was my project (https://github.com/martinvonz/jj), but other possibilities include Gitless (https://gitless.com/) or Bazaar (https://bazaar.canonical.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Gitless [1] has already been mentioned in another comment here. [2] That makes it easier to use hit for those who are not as experienced or haven’t learned about the internals of git. For a different model (and other types of workflows), consider Fossil SCM. [3] Here’s a comparison of fossil with git, and what these tools are a good fit for. [4] I found fossil easier to understand, relatively speaking, and it... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Pro Git - The Git Book is the official tutorial about Git.
Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service
Pijul - Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Learn Git Branching - "Learn Git Branching" is the most visual and interactive way to learn Git on the web; you'll be challenged with exciting levels, given step-by-step demonstrations of powerful features, and maybe even have a bit of fun along the way.