Based on our record, Pijul seems to be a lot more popular than cgit. While we know about 43 links to Pijul, we've tracked only 4 mentions of cgit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've been looking for a Git server that's simple enough for individuals to self-host and easy enough to use. It wasn't until I came across cgit (which is actually used on the official Linux kernel website) that I knew it was the one for me: https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/. Source: about 1 year ago
Can you believe some of us crazy people still do this? https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/ cgit is the git repo frontend for projects like wireguard https://undleadly.org has its source code in the sidebar for you to check out in C as well. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
You might be thinking of cgit: A hyperfast web frontend for git repositories written in C. Source: over 2 years ago
A more lightweight git https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/. Source: over 2 years ago
IMO Open Source software communities are where folks like you can really thrive. They're much closer at something like a meritocracy than traditional workplaces. > I want to make the next-gen version control system While you certainly could invent one yourself, you could consider contributing to popular ones like git/mercurial. It'd help teach you both the positive and the negative aspects of their design... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
The feature I think I would most like to see is support for patches as a more first-class object. For example reverts and cherry picks have no real metadata. This leads to conflicts when merging branches that have cherry picks (although they often auto-resolve if they are exactly the same diff) and makes asking "Does $branch contain $patch" basically impossible to answer. https://pijul.org/ greatly improves this... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
In Pijul, conflicts are not modelled as a "failure to merge", but rather as the standard case. Specifically, conflicts happen between two changes, and are solved by one change. The resolution change solves the conflict between the same two changes, no matter if other changes have been made concurrently. Once solved, conflicts never come back. - from https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you will see it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself -- what Pijul users say when they overhear git users arguing with each other about monorepos. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I believe that handling merges like this correctly was a motive for designing pijul: https://pijul.org See the item on the splash page about 'merge correctness'. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find the post detailing the behavior with a bit of searching. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.