Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Capybara VS FitNesse

Compare Capybara VS FitNesse and see what are their differences

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capybara and FitNesse)
Automated Testing
77 77%
23% 23
Testing
71 71%
29% 29
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Software Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Capybara and FitNesse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Capybara should be more popular than FitNesse. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capybara mentions (12)

View more

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capybara and FitNesse, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

JBehave - JBehave is a framework for Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD).