Software Alternatives & Reviews

FitNesse VS RSpec

Compare FitNesse VS RSpec and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

RSpec logo RSpec

RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • RSpec Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-09

FitNesse

Categories
  • Testing
  • QA
  • Automated Testing
  • Software Testing
Website fitnesse.org
Details $

RSpec

Categories
  • Automated Testing
  • Online Services
  • Testing
  • Browser Testing
Website rspec.info
Details $

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and RSpec)
Automated Testing
19 19%
81% 81
Testing
25 25%
75% 75
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and RSpec. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RSpec should be more popular than FitNesse. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

RSpec mentions (25)

  • Test Driving a Rails API - Part Two
    When starting a Rails project, you have a lot of decisions to make. Whether or not to write tests should not be one of them. The big decision is to use Minitest or Rspec. Both of those testing frameworks are great and provide everything you need to test a Rails application thoroughly. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • Should i learn testing
    As a beginner you can skip it, just focus on understanding Rails' philosophy and getting comfortable with it. However, make sure you remember to come back to unit testing later bc it's a mandatory skill for a Rails developer. Unit test can help you understand your project's specs thoroughly (assume its test coverage is more than 90%). I recommend learning RSpec instead of Rails' built-in testing tool (the one... Source: 9 months ago
  • Code Reviewing a Ruby on Rails application.
    RSpec is a testing framework for Ruby that is widely used in the Ruby on Rails community. It allows developers to write and execute automated tests. RSpec promotes behavior-driven development (BDD) by providing a readable syntax for describing the expected behavior of the application. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Ruby RSpec
    In the Ruby programming language, one of the most popular testing frameworks is RSpec. RSpec is a flexible and expressive testing tool that allows you to write and run automated tests for your Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Role tests for interfaces discovered through TDD
    There’s one very readable way to do it in Ruby using RSpec. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and RSpec, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks

JBehave - JBehave is a framework for Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD).

Capybara - Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.