Capybara VS ESLint
Compare Capybara VS ESLint and see what are their differences
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready!
Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more!
featured
Capybara
Cucumber
Selenium
JUnit
RSpec
PHPUnit
Ranorex
Robot framework
ESLint
Prettier
SonarQube
CodeClimate
Codacy
Tailwind CSS
SensioLabs Insight
Next.js
Capybara ESLintBased on our record, ESLint seems to be a lot more popular than Capybara. While we know about 229 links to ESLint, we've tracked only 12 mentions of Capybara. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / about 5 hours ago
Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
ESLint: A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
No lint errors: The committed code does not contain any lint errors (eslint). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Let’s walk through the steps for a one-time setup to configure husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks, ESLint with code styles conventions, prettier code formatter, and lint-staged. Husky automatically runs a script on each commit or push. This is useful for linting files to enforce code styles that keeps the entire code base following conventions. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
Prettier - An opinionated code formatter
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.