Software Alternatives & Reviews

Post to HackerNews VS BuildJet for GitHub Actions

Compare Post to HackerNews VS BuildJet for GitHub Actions and see what are their differences

Post to HackerNews logo Post to HackerNews

A Github action to post to news.ycombinator.com based on a github event (eg: git push)

BuildJet for GitHub Actions logo BuildJet for GitHub Actions

We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.
  • Post to HackerNews Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-24
  • BuildJet for GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Post to HackerNews and BuildJet for GitHub Actions)
Developer Tools
37 37%
63% 63
Productivity
29 29%
71% 71
GitHub
100 100%
0% 0
Tech
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Post to HackerNews and BuildJet for GitHub Actions. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuildJet for GitHub Actions seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Post to HackerNews mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Post to HackerNews yet. Tracking of Post to HackerNews recommendations started around Nov 2021.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

  • Experiment: The costs of slow build times
    Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs
    Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab
    I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub
    With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • GitHub Actions by Example
    Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Post to HackerNews and BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can also consider the following products

The GitHub Matrix Screensaver - Latest commits from GitHub visualized Matrix-style

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production

RunsOn - Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Social Post - A simple way to send messages from GitHub Actions

Actionsflow - Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions

Gource - Gource is a software version control visualization tool.