Buddy Reviews

1. firomero

   · Developer at Codechanic · about 4 years ago
   Buddy Rocks

   I have around two years when met buddy for my personal projects. I found it intuitive and great. I almost can set up pipelines with closed eyes. It helped me with development and learning. I recommend also startups and mature projects.

   🏁 Competitors: Jenkins

   👍 Pros:    Intuitive|Easy to use|Verbose|Great user experience

   👎 Cons:    A bit expensive
2. Jalib Hussain Khan

   · Software Engineer at All Resource Technologies · about 4 years ago
   Best there ever was

   Buddy works is the most awesome automating CI application, it lets you deploy sites at the best convenience. It also automatically detects the type of language your application uses and gives you the recommendation regarding the commands which should be executed

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Codeship, Travis CI
3. Lucas Pereira

   · CTO at Tezus · about 4 years ago
   The best solution for continuous delivery

   I have a eCommerce company and the Buddy helps us to delivery all projects and maintain the our platform updated. The Buddy is easy to implements and easy to operate, definitively, the best solution

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Travis CI

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Easy integration|Fast|Database documentation|Tools integrations|Visual

   👎 Cons:    Higher base price

Next.js Reviews

Buddy mentions (10)

• Most Useful CI/CD Tools for DevOps

  Buddy CI/CD is an automation platform designed to streamline and accelerate software development and deployment processes. By emphasizing simplicity and efficiency, Buddy offers an intuitive UI that allows teams to set up, monitor, and execute pipelines with minimal friction. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub

  We switched to buddy.works[0] about a year ago and honestly it’s just been… smooth. The UI is just great, the wealth and breadth of options is ever increasing and all the basics like knowing what went wrong, restarting, debugging, duplicating etc just work as you’d expect. One of the few companies I can recommend. [0] https://buddy.works. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• Learn to push an empty commit

  For continuous integration, we are using Buddy delivery pipelines which allow us to build, test and deploy applications on a single push to a specific git branch. It helps us to reduce the manual overhead of deploying code to the server and handle all the actions automatically. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Buddy.works — A CI/CD with 5 free projects and 1 concurrent runs (120 executions/month). - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

• Hide & Seek Code: Part II

  That is when we found out about Buddy. Buddy is one of those easy DIY devops tools out there. Best part is the UI and how easy it is to create a deployment pipeline. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

Next.js mentions (1071)

• Angular: Beyond the fog #1

  My only true recommendation would be to prefer React for mobile or SSR applications, as community projects (Expo for mobile and Next.js for SSR) are more mature and easier to set up. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago

• Generate Git action CI/CD pipeline using Amazon Q CLI

  This is a Next.js project bootstrapped with create-next-app. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago

• Build an Inventory Management System Using MongoDB Atlas

  We will walk you through the process of configuring and using MongoDB Atlas as your back end for your Next.js app, a powerful framework for building modern web applications with React. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• What I learned building my first AI Agent – Part 1

  After refining the user interface and doing some tests, I had a minimal functional AI agent capable of answering questions about Figma features . Since I was using Next.js, I decided to host my app on Vercel, since it was the platform that provided me the easiest and most intuitive way to do it. I was very happy with the result, even though the application was simple, in just a few days I managed to learn about... - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago

• We Fell Out of Love with Next.js and Back in Love with Ruby on Rails

  3. Load personalized data (json) But usually step 1 and 2 are served from a cdn, so very fast. On subsequent requests, 1 and 2 are usually served from the browser cache, so extremely fast. SSR is usually not faster. Most often slower. You can check yourself in your browser dev tools (network tab): https://www.solidjs.com/ vs. https://nextjs.org/ So much complexity and effort in the nextjs app, but so much slower. - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago