Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Brython VS CoffeeScript

Compare Brython VS CoffeeScript and see what are their differences

Brython logo Brython

Brython's goal is to replace Javascript with Python, as the scripting language for web browsers.

CoffeeScript logo CoffeeScript

Unfancy JavaScript
  • Brython Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19
  • CoffeeScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-31

We recommend LibHunt CoffeeScript for discovery and comparisons of trending CoffeeScript projects.

Brython features and specs

  • Easy Python Transition
    Brython allows developers who are familiar with Python to write client-side code for web applications, making it easier to transition from server-side to client-side development without learning JavaScript.
  • Pythonic HTML Interactions
    It enables developers to interact with the DOM and the browser using Python's syntax, which can be more intuitive for Python developers compared to JavaScript.
  • Rich Libraries
    Brython includes many of the common Python libraries, enabling the use of familiar tools and code structures in web development.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    Because of its simplicity and Python's concise syntax, Brython can be useful for rapid prototyping of web interfaces and functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of Brython

  • Performance Limitations
    Brython's performance might not be on par with native JavaScript, particularly for computation-heavy tasks, which could lead to slower execution times.
  • Dependency on Brython
    Using Brython ties your project to this specific implementation, which might be less widely supported compared to traditional JavaScript frameworks.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    The ecosystem for Brython is smaller than for JavaScript, meaning fewer third-party tools and libraries are available for enhancement and integration.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced JavaScript Tasks
    While basic interactions are straightforward, achieving more complex JavaScript functionality may require understanding of both Brython and JavaScript.

CoffeeScript features and specs

  • Concise Syntax
    CoffeeScript offers a more concise and readable syntax compared to vanilla JavaScript, making it easier to write and understand code quickly.
  • Less Boilerplate
    Eliminates much of the boilerplate code that is common in JavaScript, such as curly braces and semicolons, leading to cleaner code.
  • Class Syntax
    Provides a simplified syntax for defining classes and inheritance, which can make object-oriented programming more straightforward.
  • Function Binding
    Automatically binds the value of `this` to the current context in functions, reducing the need for workarounds or additional code to manage scope.
  • List Comprehensions
    Offers powerful list comprehension features, allowing developers to create complex arrays and objects more easily.
  • Syntactic Sugar
    Adds syntactic sugar to improve code aesthetics and readability, such as the `fat arrow` for functions and destructuring assignments.
  • Interoperability
    Generates clean and readable JavaScript, which makes it easy to integrate with existing JavaScript codebases and libraries.

Possible disadvantages of CoffeeScript

  • Learning Curve
    Although inspired by JavaScript, CoffeeScript has its own unique syntax and features, requiring developers to learn and adapt to a new way of writing code.
  • Debugging
    Debugging can be challenging because error messages and stack traces often refer to the compiled JavaScript rather than the original CoffeeScript code.
  • Tooling
    Although many modern tools and editors support CoffeeScript, it doesn't have as wide an ecosystem or as many support resources compared to JavaScript.
  • Performance Overhead
    The compilation step introduces a performance overhead in the development workflow, potentially slowing down the build process.
  • Declining Popularity
    With the advent of ES6 and TypeScript, CoffeeScript's popularity has waned, leading to fewer community contributions and less frequent updates.
  • Compatibility
    Certain newer JavaScript features may not be directly supported in CoffeeScript, requiring developers to wait for updates or use workarounds.
  • Maintenance
    Maintaining a CoffeeScript codebase may become increasingly difficult as the language becomes less commonly used, making it harder to find developers proficient in it.

Brython videos

كورس python تطوير الويب - باستخدام brython بديل JavaScript

More videos:

  • Review - Mensahe Ni Elloraine sa Asawang Si Brython Lamb, Ano ang Kahulugan Nito?

CoffeeScript videos

CoffeeScript Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Brython and CoffeeScript)
Programming Language
73 73%
27% 27
OOP
74 74%
26% 26
Web Scraping
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Brython and CoffeeScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Brython should be more popular than CoffeeScript. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Brython mentions (44)

  • PyScript: An open source platform for Python in the browser
    For those exploring, here was one of the best “Python in the browser” projects I found: https://brython.info/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Dillo 3.1.0 released after 9 years
    You can run Python in every web browser using PyScript (https://pyscript.net) or Brython (https://brython.info). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Reviving PyMiniRacer: A Python <> JavaScript Bridge
    On a related note, Brython lets you run Python in the browser through JavaScript. You can even see Python in the HTML with “text/python” SCRIPT tags. https://brython.info/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Is Python a better alternative for JavaScript??
    For frontend there is Brython. It is a Python interpreter written in JavaScript that allows embedding Python scripts in to HTML much like you would with JavaScript. Source: over 1 year ago
  • WASM: Big Deal or Little Deal?
    I'm rooting for WASM to win. One of the things that discouraged me from Front-end Web Development is JavaScript weirdness. It just has too many pitfalls and it's very hard to debug for a newcomer unless you study a proper JS course that tells you precisely all of these traps before you get burned. I've never found a programming language that didn't behave like I expected it on first touch, except for JS. I am... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

CoffeeScript mentions (25)

  • Ask HN: Why don't browsers just build a non-JS interpreter?
    JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Vanilla+PostCSS as an Alternative to SCSS
    As a front-end web developer, do you still use CoffeeScript or jQuery? Unlikely, as TypeScript, ES/TC39 and Babel (and the retirement of Internet Explorer thanks to @codepo8 and his EDGE team) have helped to transform JavaScript into some kind of a modern programming language. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Why React isn't dying
    On the other hand, companies choose React because that's where all the developers are. If you want to build something that can be maintained years from now, you better not choose the next hype train that goes straight to nowhere (remember CoffeeScript ?). You want something battle tested that has stood the test of time, where you won't have trouble finding developers to scale once you need to. And nobody ever got... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Civet: The CoffeeScript of TypeScript
    Http://coffeescript.org/#expressions this comes from Lisp and makes a lot of things easier. Obviously this was not implemented in ES6 because it would break compatibility and there is also some problems with implicit returns that made the feature a bit weird I wonder if a syntax like this for JS would work: const eldest = if (24>41) { escape "Liz" } else { escape "Ike" } with "escape" working like a mix of "break"... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Civet: The CoffeeScript of TypeScript
    Coffeescript[1] was a flavour of JS syntax meant to look similar to Ruby syntax. You just compiled it back to JS. It was nice for working on Rails projects since it made everything feel more “cohesive”. I assume this project is here for older Coffeescript[1] projects who want to start using typescript, and need access to interfaces/types that were present in old CS files. [1] https://coffeescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Brython and CoffeeScript, you can also consider the following products

Skulpt - Skulpt is an entirely in-browser implementation of Python.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Transcrypt - Transcrypt is a Python to JavaScript transpiler.

Octoparse - Octoparse provides easy web scraping for anyone. Our advanced web crawler, allows users to turn web pages into structured spreadsheets within clicks.

Diggernaut - Web scraping is just became easy. Extract any website content and turn it into datasets. No programming skills required.

Pyjs - pyjs is a Rich Internet Application (RIA) Development Platform for both Web and Desktop.