We recommend LibHunt CoffeeScript for discovery and comparisons of trending CoffeeScript projects.
Concise Syntax
CoffeeScript offers a more concise and readable syntax compared to vanilla JavaScript, making it easier to write and understand code quickly.
Less Boilerplate
Eliminates much of the boilerplate code that is common in JavaScript, such as curly braces and semicolons, leading to cleaner code.
Class Syntax
Provides a simplified syntax for defining classes and inheritance, which can make object-oriented programming more straightforward.
Function Binding
Automatically binds the value of `this` to the current context in functions, reducing the need for workarounds or additional code to manage scope.
List Comprehensions
Offers powerful list comprehension features, allowing developers to create complex arrays and objects more easily.
Syntactic Sugar
Adds syntactic sugar to improve code aesthetics and readability, such as the `fat arrow` for functions and destructuring assignments.
Interoperability
Generates clean and readable JavaScript, which makes it easy to integrate with existing JavaScript codebases and libraries.
While CoffeeScript introduced a lot of useful features that influenced the evolution of JavaScript itself, its popularity has diminished with the introduction of modern JavaScript (ES6 and beyond) which includes many of the features CoffeeScript provided. Developers today might prefer to stick with native JavaScript due to its widespread use and the improvements it has undergone. Therefore, CoffeeScript may not be necessary unless you're maintaining an existing codebase.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if CoffeeScript is good.
Check the traffic stats of CoffeeScript on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of CoffeeScript on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of CoffeeScript's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of CoffeeScript on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about CoffeeScript on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Not literally. And I would hardly say it was a matter of language superiority. I love Ruby myself. But Github was a lot simpler when it was still just a Rails app. But Rails was SSR by default, and most of the frontend was just Embedded Ruby (ERB) template files all over the place. And way back when, it was even relatively common to use Javascript supersets like CoffeeScript[1] and Opal[2]. The latter being Ruby... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Surely coffeescript would have been more appropriate? [0]: https://coffeescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
My personal take is this would be like JavaScript adopting an optional Coffeescript[1] syntax. It's so different that it seems odd to make it an option vs a new language, etc. [1] https://coffeescript.org/#introduction. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
As a front-end web developer, do you still use CoffeeScript or jQuery? Unlikely, as TypeScript, ES/TC39 and Babel (and the retirement of Internet Explorer thanks to @codepo8 and his EDGE team) have helped to transform JavaScript into some kind of a modern programming language. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
On the other hand, companies choose React because that's where all the developers are. If you want to build something that can be maintained years from now, you better not choose the next hype train that goes straight to nowhere (remember CoffeeScript ?). You want something battle tested that has stood the test of time, where you won't have trouble finding developers to scale once you need to. And nobody ever got... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Http://coffeescript.org/#expressions this comes from Lisp and makes a lot of things easier. Obviously this was not implemented in ES6 because it would break compatibility and there is also some problems with implicit returns that made the feature a bit weird I wonder if a syntax like this for JS would work: const eldest = if (24>41) { escape "Liz" } else { escape "Ike" } with "escape" working like a mix of "break"... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Coffeescript[1] was a flavour of JS syntax meant to look similar to Ruby syntax. You just compiled it back to JS. It was nice for working on Rails projects since it made everything feel more โcohesiveโ. I assume this project is here for older Coffeescript[1] projects who want to start using typescript, and need access to interfaces/types that were present in old CS files. [1] https://coffeescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Silly me forgot about CoffeeScript. Source: almost 4 years ago
CoffeeScript tries to solve a slightly different problem. Instead of providing a superset that makes your code less prone to bugs, CoffeeScript makes JavaScript prettier. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
After looking at all the examples I can't say I'm a fan. Sometimes it's even more verbose than standard regular expressions. Over the years I've become quite familiar with regexp so maybe I'm just biased, but I'd rather have something like CoffeeScript's block expressions instead, where you can easily group and document each part: https://coffeescript.org/#regexes. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
The Javascript language has gone through many updates throughout its long (in internet terms) history. Along with its Rapidly changing ecosystem and maturing developer base came attempts to ease some of Javascriptโs shortcomings. Of note, One of the more significant attempts was CoffeeScript (initial release in 2009) which adds Syntactic sugar and features that make programming easier. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
I think it would make a lot more sense to make a language with similar semantics to COBOL, but modernized syntax. Instead of Typescript, a better model might be Coffeescript or Moonscript, which have a nearly 1:1 semantic mapping with their target language, but offer a more ergonomic and less verbose syntax. I haven't worked with COBOL at all, but I think the verbose syntax is probably one of the most offputting... Source: about 4 years ago
Transpiled languages were nothing new to the web dev community. Letโs see - we had CoffeeScript, Flow, Elm, GWT counts? Sure why not, and of course TS (and probably more Iโve neglected). So we must ask ourselves why TS won, right? Well, at least I did. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
I mean saying that Typescript is not JS is saying CoffeeScript. Source: over 4 years ago
Agreed. I'm not a big fan but the Coffescript docs do this beautifully. https://coffeescript.org/#overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
As we explained before, since computers donโt use languages that are anything like human languages, they need a different way to communicate. Here are some of the most popular programming languages: Javascript โ used by all web browsers, Meteor, and lots of other frameworks CoffeeScript โ a โdialectโ of JavaScript. It is viewed as simpler but it converts back into JavaScript Python โ used by the Django... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Sweet as love! And there is a related language called CoffeeScript. Source: almost 5 years ago
Autumn: I don't have a really good name for this, honestly. I'm struggling to even describe it in ways that are cohesive at all. In my experience, the sorts of things that I'm interested in doing winds up involving a lot of certainly more people work than tech work. There's a lot more mentoring. There's a lot more meeting with people about the current state of things. And in my case, it was lots of discovery of... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
There are inofficial flavors like Elm, CoffeeScript or the newer Imba, but I don't want to add another thing to my already huge JavaScript toolchain. Source: almost 5 years ago
If anybody reading this does use coffeescript today, I'd love to know why. Well I obviously use it (a lot), and do so simply because I prefer its syntax. See top of https://coffeescript.org for an overview+playground. Source: almost 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing CoffeeScript to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is CoffeeScript good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss CoffeeScript here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.