Bootstrap Studio VS Jekyll

Bootstrap Studio Reviews

1. Guest    

   over 1 year ago
   Best one time paid software for web site building

   Best one time paid software for web site building

Jekyll Reviews

Bootstrap Studio mentions (25)

• A collection of useful Mac Apps

  Bootstrap Studio - Price: $29-59 ("one-time" purchase, only for $59 option, the other has 1 year free updates after that you're out) A powerful desktop app for creating responsive websites using the Bootstrap framework. Source: 10 months ago

• How to build a website without frameworks and tons of libraries

  I adopted this mentality a few years ago and it's served me very well. Pro tip to anyone looking to do the same without losing the benefits of SquareSpace's WYSIWYG editor: try out Bootstrap Studio [0], which gives you a visual editor but also full control over the CSS and the ability to create reusable components. The licensing is also user-friendly (doesn't require a subscription). [0]: http://bootstrapstudio.io. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• [TASK} Look for a cofounder

  You can use the WYSIWYG for the frontend. Like https://bootstrapstudio.io/ or https://docs.atrilabs.com/. Source: about 1 year ago

• Figma to Bootstrap?

  Would this assist you? https://bootstrapstudio.io. Source: about 1 year ago

• Website design for a software product - but how?

  Fair fair. Most of the services have export functions to take your code offline, not sure if Softr does. But anycase, if you don't want to use a no-code web-based builder, then you can try something like Bootstrap Studio to build with Bootstrap CSS. It's drag and drop too, but needs a little more work (i.e. Gotta read the bootstrap docs to understand how to compartmentalize components. But it's still easy once you... Source: over 1 year ago

Jekyll mentions (180)

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago