Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

bacon.js VS Redux.js

Compare bacon.js VS Redux.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

bacon.js logo bacon.js

A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.

Redux.js logo Redux.js

Predictable state container for JavaScript apps
  • bacon.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-17
  • Redux.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17

bacon.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Redux.js features and specs

  • Predictable State Management
    Redux provides a single source of truth for the state of your application, which makes it easier to manage and debug. The state changes in a predictable way, which helps in maintaining consistency across the application.
  • Ecosystem and Community
    Redux has a large community and a rich ecosystem of middleware, development tools, and libraries. This support can accelerate development and troubleshooting.
  • Time-Travel Debugging
    With tools like Redux DevTools, developers can leverage features such as action logging, hot-reloading, and time-travel debugging, helping to understand and trace state changes effectively.
  • Middleware Support
    Redux supports middleware that lets you intercept actions and perform side effects like API calls, logging, or modifying actions before they reach reducers. This makes handling asynchronous operations more manageable.
  • Compatibility with React
    Although Redux can be used with any front-end library or framework, it pairs particularly well with React. Libraries like React-Redux offer seamless integration, making it easier to bind React components to the Redux store.

Possible disadvantages of Redux.js

  • Boilerplate Code
    Redux often requires a significant amount of boilerplate code, including actions, reducers, and store configuration. This may result in more verbose code, especially for simple applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Understanding the principles of Redux, such as actions, reducers, and the store, along with concepts like immutability and pure functions, can be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its strict immutability principles and the frequent creation of new state objects, Redux can introduce performance overhead, especially in large applications with complex state management needs.
  • Rigid Structure
    While the rigid structure of Redux can enforce good practices, it can also be restrictive and inflexible for certain types of applications. Developers might find it cumbersome to work within the boilerplate constraints.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For simple or small applications, the complexity that Redux introduces can be overkill. In such cases, alternatives like the Context API in React or simpler state management solutions might be more appropriate.

bacon.js videos

Bacon.js for Breakfast: An intro to functional reactive programming

Redux.js videos

No Redux.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bacon.js and Redux.js)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
JS Library
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using bacon.js and Redux.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Redux.js seems to be a lot more popular than bacon.js. While we know about 189 links to Redux.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of bacon.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bacon.js mentions (1)

  • Static code generation DSL.
    It would be awesome to develop something abstract and useful for usage as common PL (besides just solving specific problem), but it's really hard to develop a general purpose language (with memory management, mutations, etc.). For example, at my work I built reactive library mostly similar to Rx.js or Bacon.js, but with additional ability to compose different reactive systems on top of each other, so that... Source: over 3 years ago

Redux.js mentions (189)

  • Very Basic - Redux
    If you need more in depth information check out the documentation. https://redux.js.org/ It's actually pretty great. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
  • Architecture and Design Patterns in Front-End
    In frontend, the most probably well-known approach is Flux and its most common implementation, Redux. This is an example of unidirectional data flow. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
  • Organisation of Data Flows
    The best known example of an architecture with unidirectional data flow is Flux and, as its implementation, Redux. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Valentine’s Day Breakup: React Dumps Create React App
    CRA makes integrating libraries like Redux and React Router easy without requiring complex Webpack and Babel configurations. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • UmiJS: the Shaolin of web frameworks
    Dva. A plugin-based state management solution (Redux + Sagas). Also quite popular in narrow communities outside of the Umi world. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bacon.js and Redux.js, you can also consider the following products

LIPS Scheme - Scheme based powerful lisp interpreter written in JavaScript

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

EVT - 💧EventEmitter's typesafe replacement💧

react-context - Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.

Kefir - A Reactive Programming library for JavaScript.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps