Backbone.js VS Shoelace.css
Compare Backbone.js VS Shoelace.css and see what are their differences
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place.
featured
Backbone.js
AngularJS
ExpressJS
ember.js
React
Vue.js
Chart.js
Sencha Ext JS
Shoelace.css
Tailwind CSS
DaisyUI
CSSGradient.io
Unused CSS
stenciljs
Chakra UI
Preact.js
Backbone.js Shoelace.cssNo Shoelace.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Shoelace.css might be a bit more popular than Backbone.js. We know about 25 links to it since March 2021 and only 17 links to Backbone.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Https://backbonejs.org/#View There is also a github repo that has examples of MVC patterns adapted to the web platform. - Source: Hacker News / 30 days ago
Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Got it thanks for the context. I've read the web app and it seems to me it is just https://backbonejs.org/ re-written in Typescript and allows JSX. I'm very certain Typescript and JSX will have improved the DX for Backbone like apps, but it doesn't address all of the other issues that teams had with Backbone. e.g. Cyclical event propagation, state stored in the DOM (i.e. Appendchild is error prone in large code... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Even further nowadays, docs are created using Docusaurus. I don't have problem with it but documentation should be good (eye) friendly than easy to write. Why not be creative while writing docs such as - Backbone.js - https://backbonejs.org Or https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html as code annotation. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... Usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framework is not going to work. It seems that you are not using a frontend framework like Vue.js. So I would recommend a library using web components for the interactivity. One good... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Can webcomponents be trivially used with HTMX? Like for example: https://shoelace.style/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I created a simple example with a bunch of Shoelace components where they are being lazy-loaded from a CDN. I loaded the components this way to show worst-case-scenario loading performance. As you can see, it still loads quite quickly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
A recent example of this was when I was helping a team get up and running with Shoelace in a Next.js application. Shoelace provides react wrappers, but they were throwing an error when Next.js tried to server-side render them. Fortunately, Shoelace ships their CEM, so I was able to use it to generate new wrappers that were SSR-safe. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
I've yet to see this go wrong in practice. The kinds of components that are worth publishing as web components are often large, non-trivial components. Eg media libraries, emoji pickers (like the one made by this article's author), chatbox interfaces, and so on. They are the kinds of things you only have a limited number of on your page. If a component is small and focused in scope, it's likely either written in... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS
ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps
CSSGradient.io - As a free css gradient generator tool, this website lets you create a colorful gradient background for your website, blog, or social media profile.