Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AWS CodeBuild VS AWS CodeCommit

Compare AWS CodeBuild VS AWS CodeCommit and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

AWS CodeBuild logo AWS CodeBuild

Online shopping from the earth's biggest selection of books, magazines, music, DVDs, videos, electronics, computers, software, apparel & accessories, shoes, jewelry, tools & hardware, housewares, furniture, sporting goods, beauty & personal care, br…

AWS CodeCommit logo AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure private Git repositories.
  • AWS CodeBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19
  • AWS CodeCommit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22

AWS CodeBuild features and specs

  • Fully Managed
    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service. Users do not need to worry about provisioning, managing, and scaling their own build servers.
  • Scalability
    CodeBuild automatically scales up and down to meet the demands of your build process, ensuring that builds are completed quickly without manual intervention.
  • Pay-as-You-Go Pricing
    Users only pay for the compute time they consume with CodeBuild, making it a cost-effective solution for many developer teams.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3, EC2, and CloudWatch, providing a cohesive environment for your development and deployment pipelines.
  • Custom Environment Support
    Users can define their own build environments with custom Docker images, providing flexibility to meet specific build requirements.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeBuild

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    Setting up projects in CodeBuild can be complex for users who are new to AWS or continuous integration services.
  • Limited Local Testing
    Unlike some CI tools, AWS CodeBuild provides limited options for running builds locally before pushing changes, which can hinder testing processes.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with AWS services may face a steep learning curve when first using CodeBuild as it involves understanding several AWS concepts and configurations.
  • Potential Costs at Scale
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for small workloads, costs can accumulate significantly as usage scales up if not managed carefully.
  • Configuration Management
    Managing build spec files and environment configurations can become complex, especially in projects with many different build processes.

AWS CodeCommit features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS CodeCommit scales automatically, so it can handle projects of all sizes without any need for manual intervention.
  • High Availability
    The service is hosted on AWS, which offers high availability and durability thanks to its reliable infrastructure.
  • Security
    AWS CodeCommit integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing fine-grained access control and encryption capabilities.
  • Cost Efficiency
    For small teams, CodeCommit is cost-effective as it doesn't charge for the first 5 active users per month.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, promoting a streamlined CI/CD pipeline.
  • Fully Managed
    Because AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service, you don't need to worry about maintaining a version control server yourself.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeCommit

  • Learning Curve
    New users, especially those not familiar with AWS, might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of AWS services.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more mature platforms like GitHub or GitLab, the ecosystem around AWS CodeCommit is relatively limited in terms of third-party integrations and extensions.
  • User Interface
    The web interface of CodeCommit is not as user-friendly or feature-rich as competitors like GitHub or Bitbucket.
  • Regional Availability
    While AWS CodeCommit is available in many AWS regions, it might not be available in all regions, limiting its use for some global teams.
  • Storage Limitations
    Though generally adequate for standard use cases, larger teams or heavily data-driven projects may find the repository storage limitations to be a constraint.

AWS CodeBuild videos

+ Add

AWS CodeBuild Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - AWS CodeBuild Overview
  • Review - All the AWS CodeBuild You Can Stomach in 45 Minutes

AWS CodeCommit videos

+ Add

AWS Codecommit Hands On

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit
  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit: Setting Up Permissions

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeCommit)

AWS CodeBuild

AWS CodeCommit

Continuous Integration
70 70%
Continuous Integration
30% 30
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeCommit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeBuild Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS CodeBuild yet.
Be the first one to post

AWS CodeCommit Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
AWS CodeCommit eliminates the need for hosting, maintaining, backing up, and scaling your source control servers. It also allows you to customise access for each user to your repositories, with automatically encrypted files in transit. Additionally, it keeps your repositories highly available and accessible with a scalable, redundant, and durable architecture.
Source: www.wearedevelopers.com
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) to host secure, scalable, and private Git repositories.
Source: snappify.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeCommit should be more popular than AWS CodeBuild. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS CodeBuild mentions (13)

  • Low Cost "Overkill" AWS Infrastructure for a Newborn Startup
    Therefore, I used AWS Codebuild and AWS CodePipeline to automate the steps of building and deploying the services. The diagram below depicts all the steps required to continuously deliver the frontend and backend applications:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How CodeCatalyst compares to other AWS Services related to Development and CI/CD processes
    We treat these services in one  group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Well-Architected Review - Part II - Operational Excellence
    Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS - Multi Environment deployments - Part 2
    AWS CodeBuild: fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DEVOPS AS A SERVICE
    AWS CodeBuild is a completely managed service for compiling code, testing quality assurance using automated procedures, and generating software ready for deployment. CodeBuild is incredibly secure, as each client receives a unique set of encryption keys to include in each created artifact. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

AWS CodeCommit mentions (22)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeCommit, you can also consider the following products

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Loading...