Based on our record, Astro Build seems to be a lot more popular than Alpine.js. While we know about 182 links to Astro Build, we've tracked only 14 mentions of Alpine.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I'm currently building a project using Astro, to which I've added basic authentication via Twitch so users can log in to view their inventory for my new stream game by calling an API on the back end (my Twitch bot). I'm using Astro in SSR mode, and authentication is provided by Auth.js via auth-astro. When using Auth.js to authenticate, it saves three cookies in the browser to remember that you've logged in to... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
I rebuilt my personal website[1] (static site) using Astro[2], and it was a pleasant experience. [1]: https://ivylee.github.io/ [2]: https://astro.build/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
Or Astro; if you’d like to integrate React, VueJS etc. Code as well. Use their themes page here to get a starting point. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
I have spent today learning the new Astro SSG. You can read about it at https://astro.build/ or better yet you can get started with it at https://docs.astro.build/en/install/auto/. While Visual Studio isn't exactly a SSG, they way you code with it can make static web pages. VS has so much more power than that. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
We'll use several interesting technologies to achieve this: Strapi CMS to take care of the content management and backend, Astro which is a great new technology for quickly creating blazing fast frontend apps, and ChatGPT to provide the article summaries. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
✨ In recent months, I have been developing web projects using GOTTHA stack: Go + Templ + Tailwind CSS + htmx + Alpine.js. As soon as I'm ready to talk about all the subtleties and pitfalls, I'll post it on my social networks. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
> But honestly, torn towards htmx but undecided. We are in the middle of migrating from our monster react application into server rendered pages (with jinja2). The velocity at which we are able to ship and the reduction of complexity has been great so far. Managing client side state for simple things like (is the dropdown open/closed), listening to keyboard events and such can be done with something like alpine-js... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I would say - htmx (https://htmx.org/) - Alpine.js (https://alpinejs.dev/) both are minimal and very easy to get started. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Sure, you can use any number of JS-avoidance libraries. I'm a fan of Turbo, and there's also htmx, Unpoly, Alpine, hyperscript, swup, barba.js, and probably others. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Direct DOM, but with a library. Specifically AlpineJS since it follows Vue closely in design practices allowing me to scale into a full web application if necessary (basically swapping to Vue takes minimal work). The Morph plugin is specifically what I like using. Source: 6 months ago
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
htmx - high power tools for HTML
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
SvelteKit - SvelteKit is the official Svelte application framework
Stimulus - A modest JavaScript framework for the HTML you already have, by Basecamp