Alpine.js Reviews

Next.js Reviews

Alpine.js mentions (14)

• 🤓 My top 3 Go packages that I wish I'd known about earlier

  ✨ In recent months, I have been developing web projects using GOTTHA stack: Go + Templ + Tailwind CSS + htmx + Alpine.js. As soon as I'm ready to talk about all the subtleties and pitfalls, I'll post it on my social networks. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Htmx Is Composable?

  > But honestly, torn towards htmx but undecided. We are in the middle of migrating from our monster react application into server rendered pages (with jinja2). The velocity at which we are able to ship and the reduction of complexity has been great so far. Managing client side state for simple things like (is the dropdown open/closed), listening to keyboard events and such can be done with something like alpine-js... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Pocketbase: Open-source back end in 1 file

  I would say - htmx (https://htmx.org/) - Alpine.js (https://alpinejs.dev/) both are minimal and very easy to get started. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Coming to grips with JS: a Rubyist's deep dive

  Sure, you can use any number of JS-avoidance libraries. I'm a fan of Turbo, and there's also htmx, Unpoly, Alpine, hyperscript, swup, barba.js, and probably others. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• What is your opinion about developers who do direct DOM manipulations instead of using modern web frameworks (like React, Vue, Angular) to achieve maximum performance?

  Direct DOM, but with a library. Specifically AlpineJS since it follows Vue closely in design practices allowing me to scale into a full web application if necessary (basically swapping to Vue takes minimal work). The Morph plugin is specifically what I like using. Source: 6 months ago

Next.js mentions (935)

• Deploying Remix-Vite on Lambda using Pulumi

  Remix is a very cool React-based framework that makes the final jump back from the browser to the server. After starting with SPAs that fully ran in the browser, Next.js got the idea of rendering React components in the server, reducing the initial load time and improving crawlability. Remix takes this a step further: while Next.js cannot render dynamic content on the server, Remix can. As a user, this means... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

• Why and How to Migrate Your React App from CRA to Vite

  Here is the tricky situation and that's why CRA is in a semi-dead state, it has not been deprecated but isn't receiving any updates not even security updates, along with that the new React.dev documentation doesn't mention CRA but suggests using React meta-frameworks like Next and Remix for new projects. You can read more about React's reasoning for it in this github issue discussion. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

• React 19: A Comprehensive Guide to the Latest Features and Updates

  This Reactjs version also includes React Server Components, so you can easily render components on the server. If you’re familiar with Next.js, whose components are server components by default, this is the same idea. Server components have advantages such as faster page load time, better SEO optimization, and overall better performance. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago

• Building An E-Commerce Store With NextJS

  Next.js - for creating the application’s user interface and backend. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago

• How to Dockerize a Nextjs Application Using Docker

  Next.js is a powerful React framework, that is widely used for building server-side rendered (SSR) or static web applications. Dockerizing a Next.js application can streamline the deployment process and ensure consistency between development, testing, and production environments. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago