Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
g

Asciidoctor VS gnu source-highlight

Compare Asciidoctor VS gnu source-highlight and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Asciidoctor logo Asciidoctor

In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.

gnu source-highlight logo gnu source-highlight

gnu source-highlight is a command line program that can be used to highlight source code, it supports output to many formats including html, ODF, ANSI and groff.
  • Asciidoctor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • gnu source-highlight Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-09-23

Asciidoctor features and specs

  • Human-Readable Syntax
    Asciidoctor uses the AsciiDoc syntax, which is designed to be easy to read and write by humans. This makes it accessible for both technical and non-technical users, easing the learning curve.
  • Output Formats
    It supports a wide range of output formats including HTML, PDF, DocBook, EPUB, and more, providing flexibility in how documents are presented and shared.
  • Customizable and Extensible
    Asciidoctor is highly customizable and can be extended with custom extensions and plugins. This allows users to tailor the tool to their specific documentation needs and workflows.
  • Open Source
    Asciidoctor is an open-source project, fostering a community-driven development environment. This ensures transparency and continuous improvements driven by a diverse set of contributors.
  • Integration with Tooling
    It integrates well with various build tools and editors such as Maven, Gradle, and AsciiDoc plugins for IDEs, aiding in seamless documentation processes and version control.

Possible disadvantages of Asciidoctor

  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic documentation is easy to produce, mastering advanced features and custom extensions may require a deeper understanding of the system, which can be challenging for new users.
  • Limited Native PDF Support
    Asciidoctor's native support for generating PDFs is less robust compared to its HTML output, often requiring additional tools like Asciidoctor PDF or DocBook for high-quality results.
  • Dependency Management
    External dependencies are sometimes needed for specific outputs or extensions (like PDF generation), which might complicate project setups and increase build times.
  • Less Widespread Adoption
    Compared to markdown, Asciidoctor has less widespread adoption, which might result in fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations available for support.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Integration with certain tools and workflows can present compatibility issues, especially when dealing with continuously updated software ecosystems.

gnu source-highlight features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Asciidoctor videos

+ Add

Code your documentation with AsciiDoctor - open source is for everyone

More videos:

  • Review - [VDM19] Asciidoctor: because writing docs does not have to suck by Adres Almiray
  • Review - 10 Useful Asciidoctor Tips

gnu source-highlight videos

No gnu source-highlight videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Asciidoctor and gnu source-highlight)

Asciidoctor

gnu source-highlight

Documentation
94 94%
Documentation
6% 6
Markdown Editor
57 57%
Markdown Editor
43% 43
Documentation As A Service & Tools
100 100%
Documentation As A Service & Tools
0% 0
Knowledge Base
100 100%
Knowledge Base
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Asciidoctor and gnu source-highlight. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Asciidoctor and gnu source-highlight

Asciidoctor Reviews

  1. Elisa
    · Technical Writer at Self ·
    Professional output from open source

    If you are looking for an open documentation solution ny which you can implement single sourcing while integrating with a complex build process then this is a great solution.

    👍 Pros:    Easy integration|Easy to use

gnu source-highlight Reviews

We have no reviews of gnu source-highlight yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Asciidoctor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Asciidoctor mentions (24)

View more

gnu source-highlight mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of gnu source-highlight yet. Tracking of gnu source-highlight recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Asciidoctor and gnu source-highlight, you can also consider the following products

Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber

Google Keep - Capture notes, share them with others, and access them from your computer, phone or tablet. Free with a Google account.

reStructuredText - Invented for Python documentation.

Typora - A minimal Markdown reading & writing app.

Antora - A static site generator for creating documentation sites from AsciiDoc content aggregated from...

Pygments - Generic syntax highlighter suitable for use in code hosting, forums, wikis or other applications...

Loading...