Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Asciidoctor VS Charles Proxy

Compare Asciidoctor VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Asciidoctor logo Asciidoctor

In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • Asciidoctor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

Asciidoctor features and specs

  • Human-Readable Syntax
    Asciidoctor uses the AsciiDoc syntax, which is designed to be easy to read and write by humans. This makes it accessible for both technical and non-technical users, easing the learning curve.
  • Output Formats
    It supports a wide range of output formats including HTML, PDF, DocBook, EPUB, and more, providing flexibility in how documents are presented and shared.
  • Customizable and Extensible
    Asciidoctor is highly customizable and can be extended with custom extensions and plugins. This allows users to tailor the tool to their specific documentation needs and workflows.
  • Open Source
    Asciidoctor is an open-source project, fostering a community-driven development environment. This ensures transparency and continuous improvements driven by a diverse set of contributors.
  • Integration with Tooling
    It integrates well with various build tools and editors such as Maven, Gradle, and AsciiDoc plugins for IDEs, aiding in seamless documentation processes and version control.

Possible disadvantages of Asciidoctor

  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic documentation is easy to produce, mastering advanced features and custom extensions may require a deeper understanding of the system, which can be challenging for new users.
  • Limited Native PDF Support
    Asciidoctor's native support for generating PDFs is less robust compared to its HTML output, often requiring additional tools like Asciidoctor PDF or DocBook for high-quality results.
  • Dependency Management
    External dependencies are sometimes needed for specific outputs or extensions (like PDF generation), which might complicate project setups and increase build times.
  • Less Widespread Adoption
    Compared to markdown, Asciidoctor has less widespread adoption, which might result in fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations available for support.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Integration with certain tools and workflows can present compatibility issues, especially when dealing with continuously updated software ecosystems.

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Asciidoctor videos

+ Add

Code your documentation with AsciiDoctor - open source is for everyone

More videos:

  • Review - [VDM19] Asciidoctor: because writing docs does not have to suck by Adres Almiray
  • Review - 10 Useful Asciidoctor Tips

Charles Proxy videos

No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Asciidoctor and Charles Proxy)

Asciidoctor

Charles Proxy

Documentation
100 100%
Documentation
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Documentation As A Service & Tools
100 100%
Documentation As A Service & Tools
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
Proxy
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Asciidoctor and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Asciidoctor and Charles Proxy

Asciidoctor Reviews

  1. Elisa
    · Technical Writer at Self ·
    Professional output from open source

    If you are looking for an open documentation solution ny which you can implement single sourcing while integrating with a complex build process then this is a great solution.

    👍 Pros:    Easy integration|Easy to use

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Asciidoctor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Asciidoctor mentions (24)

View more

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Asciidoctor and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

pandoc - Pandoc is a Haskell library for converting from one markup format to another, and a command-line...

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

reStructuredText - Invented for Python documentation.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Loading...