arXiv
SCI-HUB
Google Scholar
Unpaywall
Z-Lib
Libgen Desktop
PubMed.gov
Archive.org
ScienceDirect
Emerald Insight
Springer Link
Sage Journals
Loc.gov
ProQuest
Epub
IntechOpen
arXiv ScienceDirectBased on our record, arXiv seems to be a lot more popular than ScienceDirect. While we know about 315 links to arXiv, we've tracked only 20 mentions of ScienceDirect. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I’m also curious about the role decentralized, open knowledge bases might play as a counterweight to AI-driven narrowing. Could initiatives like Wikidata, arXiv, or IPFS provide a bulwark against knowledge collapse by making marginal information more accessible? There’s lots of room for further work here. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
Just read some AI papers on https://arxiv.org , that will give you an idea(but don't worry too much, they probably used some AI in the making of those papers, lol). But as soon the next generation of AI is out (the next step in AI), everything will change again. Source: 5 months ago
Prepublisher journals, or https://arxiv.org. Source: 5 months ago
Check out paperswithcode, scroll through arxiv, or browse some well-known conferences in the field (NeurIPS, ICML). Source: 5 months ago
I recently noticed that symplectic geometry has its own category on https://arxiv.org/, and generally after some quick research it looks like it's a very active field in math. Source: 6 months ago
You can research some more in those two sites (especially in sciencedirect.com, you can filter by open studies if you are broke like me). Source: 10 months ago
That's incorrect. You also need to get some better sources. EPA.gov, the ICCT report, and sciencedirect.com are highly political institutions. Source: about 1 year ago
First of all, sciencedirect.com is not a peer reviewed science site. it gets a 2 out of 4 stars when rated by actual scientists. Source: over 1 year ago
The source "sciencedirect.com" is at the end of the quote and you can easily do your own research but you won't. Also the point is to show the hypocrisy that people accept random standards like that because you're programmed to. Source: over 1 year ago
You might want to look at building a passive solar water heater. According to sciencedirect.com, "passive solar water heating systems generally transfer heat by natural circulation as a result of buoyancy due to temperature difference between two regimes; hence they do not require pumps to operate. They are the most commonly used solar water heating systems for domestic application." They are non-electric. Source: over 1 year ago
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Emerald Insight - Emerald Insight is a website that offers you thousands of books, articles, journals, and research papers on virtually all subjects from physical sciences such as physics and chemistry, to life sciences such as botany and zoology.
Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
Springer Link - Springer Link is a website offering access to millions of articles, research papers, books, and journals to researchers and students.
Unpaywall - Legally read research papers behind paywalls.
Sage Journals - Sage Journals is a web application where you can find journals on virtually any topic.