Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than ScienceDirect. While we know about 999 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 20 mentions of ScienceDirect. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You can research some more in those two sites (especially in sciencedirect.com, you can filter by open studies if you are broke like me). Source: 10 months ago
That's incorrect. You also need to get some better sources. EPA.gov, the ICCT report, and sciencedirect.com are highly political institutions. Source: about 1 year ago
First of all, sciencedirect.com is not a peer reviewed science site. it gets a 2 out of 4 stars when rated by actual scientists. Source: over 1 year ago
The source "sciencedirect.com" is at the end of the quote and you can easily do your own research but you won't. Also the point is to show the hypocrisy that people accept random standards like that because you're programmed to. Source: over 1 year ago
You might want to look at building a passive solar water heater. According to sciencedirect.com, "passive solar water heating systems generally transfer heat by natural circulation as a result of buoyancy due to temperature difference between two regimes; hence they do not require pumps to operate. They are the most commonly used solar water heating systems for domestic application." They are non-electric. Source: over 1 year ago
A few may know, that google scholar(https://scholar.google.com/) does not offer a feature for arranging the search results based on the number of citations. Several years ago, one developer published a Python code (https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar) to handle this. I had been inspired by his work, but I wanted to show the list of... - Source: Hacker News / 21 days ago
To that point, https://scholar.google.com/ is still useful. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
1) find the doi number [1a][1b] 2) find sources that cite the doi number -> google scholar[2][3] 3) filter for 'github' ----- [1a]resolve a doi name : https://dx.doi.org/ [1b]find a doi number : https://answers.lib.iup.edu/faq/31945 [2] : https://scholar.google.com/ [3] : google with "site:http://doi.org/" [4] : finding a doi in document page :... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Half of those are about science, during my Ph.D., I was told to use scholar.google.com, which works great as far as I can tell. Couple it to sci-hub and you get all the scientific literature you need. Source: 5 months ago
Scholar.google.com exists also which is what you use for studies. Source: 5 months ago
Emerald Insight - Emerald Insight is a website that offers you thousands of books, articles, journals, and research papers on virtually all subjects from physical sciences such as physics and chemistry, to life sciences such as botany and zoology.
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Springer Link - Springer Link is a website offering access to millions of articles, research papers, books, and journals to researchers and students.
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Sage Journals - Sage Journals is a web application where you can find journals on virtually any topic.
Forge - Static web hosting made simple