Apache Tomcat

Website

tomcat.apache.org

$ Details

Categories

#Web And Application Servers #Application Server #Java #Open Source

Docker Swarm

Website

github.com

$ Details

-

Categories

#Developer Tools #DevOps Tools #Containers As A Service #Cloud Computing

Apache Tomcat features and specs

• Open Source
  Apache Tomcat is an open-source software, which means it is freely available for use and modifications. This can significantly reduce the cost of ownership and allows for customization.
• Community Support
  Being a widely-used open-source server, Tomcat has a large and active community of developers and users who contribute to its documentation, plugins, and forums, providing extensive support.
• Lightweight
  Tomcat is designed to be a lightweight servlet container, making it faster and less resource-intensive compared to full-blown Java EE application servers.
• Integration with Popular Frameworks
  Tomcat integrates well with popular Java frameworks such as Spring and Hibernate, making it easier for developers to deploy and manage web applications.
• Easy to Set Up and Configure
  Tomcat is relatively easy to set up and configure, making it suitable for both development and production environments.
• Frequent Updates
  Regular updates and patches are released to improve performance, security, and compatibility, ensuring the server is up-to-date with the latest web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Tomcat

• Limited Functionality
  While Tomcat is a powerful servlet container, it lacks some of the advanced features found in full-fledged Java EE application servers, which might be necessary for complex enterprise applications.
• Resource Management
  Tomcat's default configuration might not be suitable for high traffic web applications, requiring significant tweaking and tuning to handle heavy loads effectively.
• Documentation Quality
  The documentation, while extensive, can sometimes be hard to navigate and understand, especially for beginners. This can slow down the learning curve.
• Limited Built-in Tools
  Compared to other full-stack application servers, Tomcat comes with limited built-in tooling for monitoring, load balancing, and clustering, often requiring third-party solutions.
• Security Concerns
  As with any open-source project, security vulnerabilities may emerge. It requires constant monitoring and timely updates to ensure security.
• Lack of EJB Support
  Tomcat does not support Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB), limiting its use in scenarios where EJB is a crucial component of the architecture.

Docker Swarm features and specs

• Simplicity
  Docker Swarm is easy to set up and use, especially for those already familiar with Docker. It integrates seamlessly into the Docker ecosystem, providing a straightforward solution for container orchestration without the need for additional tools.
• Native Docker Integration
  Swarm is built into Docker, meaning that Docker users do not need to install or configure another orchestration tool. This provides a consistent experience from development to production.
• Declarative Service Model
  Swarm allows users to define the desired state of their services, and the system works to maintain that state. This includes scaling services up or down, and handling load balancing.
• Easy Scaling
  Docker Swarm makes it easy to scale applications horizontally by simply changing the number of replicas of a service. The platform manages the distribution of these replicas across the available nodes.
• Built-in Load Balancing
  Swarm includes built-in load balancing, distributing incoming client requests to running containers based on task states and node availability.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Swarm

• Limited Ecosystem
  Compared to Kubernetes, Docker Swarm has a more limited ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. This can make it less flexible for complex or custom setups.
• Less Feature-Rich
  Although sufficient for many use cases, Swarm lacks some advanced features that other orchestrators like Kubernetes offer, such as custom scheduling policies, complex networking configurations, and a broader range of storage options.
• Community and Support
  The Docker Swarm community is smaller and less active compared to Kubernetes. This affects the available support, community-contributed tools, and overall development pace.
• Scaling Limits
  While Docker Swarm can handle small to medium-sized clusters efficiently, it may not perform as well as Kubernetes in very large-scale deployments, particularly in terms of resource management and fault tolerance.
• Future Uncertainty
  With Docker's increasing focus on Kubernetes, the long-term future of Docker Swarm is uncertain. This raises concerns about investing in a technology that might not be as actively developed or supported in the future.

Introducing Apache Tomcat 8.5

More videos:

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm | Container Orchestration War | Kubernetes Training | Edureka

More videos: