Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Pulsar VS NSQ

Compare Apache Pulsar VS NSQ and see what are their differences

LaunchBrightly
Automatically generate screenshots reflecting the latest version of your product and eliminate the manual burden of updating product screenshots in your help center. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Pulsar logo Apache Pulsar

Apache Pulsar is an open-source, distributed messaging and streaming platform built for the cloud.

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.
  • Apache Pulsar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-12-17
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07

Apache Pulsar videos

No Apache Pulsar videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

NSQ videos

+ Add

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Pulsar and NSQ)

Apache Pulsar

NSQ

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100
Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing
100 100%
Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing
0% 0
Data Integration
24 24%
Data Integration
76% 76

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Pulsar and NSQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Pulsar and NSQ

Apache Pulsar Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
Pulsar also provides a rich set of client libraries for various programming languages, making it easy to build messaging and streaming applications using Pulsar. Apache Pulsar is a popular choice for real-time data processing and messaging in large-scale data processing applications, such as those used in the financial, telecommunications, and internet-of-things industries.
Source: docs.vanus.ai

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NSQ should be more popular than Apache Pulsar. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Pulsar mentions (1)

  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Stream-processing platforms such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, or Redpanda are specifically engineered to foster event-driven communication in a distributed system and they can be a great choice for developing loosely coupled applications. Stream processing platforms analyze data in motion, offering near-zero latency advantages. For example, consider an alert system for monitoring factory equipment. If a... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Pulsar and NSQ, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

NATS - NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Memphis - Highly scalable, and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming applications fast.

Loading...