Software Alternatives & Reviews

NSQ VS ZeroMQ

Compare NSQ VS ZeroMQ and see what are their differences

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.

ZeroMQ logo ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07
  • ZeroMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

NSQ videos

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

ZeroMQ videos

Pieter Hintjens - Distribution, Scale and Flexibility with ZeroMQ

More videos:

  • Review - DragonOS LTS Review srsLTE ZeroMQ, tetra, IMSI catcher, irdium toolkit, and modmobmap (rtlsdr)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NSQ and ZeroMQ)
Stream Processing
28 28%
72% 72
Data Integration
28 28%
72% 72
Web Service Automation
31 31%
69% 69
ETL
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NSQ and ZeroMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NSQ and ZeroMQ

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

ZeroMQ Reviews

We have no reviews of ZeroMQ yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ZeroMQ should be more popular than NSQ. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

ZeroMQ mentions (35)

  • Omegle is Gone, What Will Fill It's Gap?
    In this post from 2011, the creator of Omegle, Leif Brooks, explains what technology is used, including Python and a library called gevent for the backend. On top of that, Adobe Cirrus is used for streaming video. Though this post was 12 years ago, it is valuable to know what a web application like Omegle requires. A modern library that may provide some functionality for a text chat at a minimum may be... Source: 6 months ago
  • Video Streaming at Scale with Kubernetes and RabbitMQ
    They might be thinking of something like ZeroMQ, which is pretty well liked: https://zeromq.org/ That said, I wouldn't call RabbitMQ that heavyweight myself, at least when compared to something like Apache Kafka. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • learn by doing vs learn by course?
    If you want to learn message passing in an environment you're familiar with, you should check out ZeroMQ. It's a C++ lib for socket abstraction, it's immensely useful in distributed systems, it can also do in-process message passing, and it's got bindings/ports for C and Rust. Source: 11 months ago
  • Shipping large ML models with electron
    Inspired by the IDE language server protocol, I created an API interface between the electron and the Python ML interface. ZeroMQ turned out be an invaluable resource as a fast and lightweight messaging queue between the two. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • how to display constantly changing data from a database in real time
    If you really need it live, like for a chat or auctions you can use https://zeromq.org/ over websockets. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NSQ and ZeroMQ, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Amazon MQ - Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Easily migrate messaging.

ubus - User space inter process communication that adheres to the Unix philosophy.