Multi-tenancy
Apache Pulsar supports multi-tenancy, allowing multiple independent applications to operate in isolated environments within the same cluster. This enables more efficient resource usage and simplified operational management.
Geo-replication
Pulsar's built-in geo-replication feature allows for data to be replicated across different geographic locations, providing high availability and disaster recovery capabilities.
Scalability
Pulsar offers easy horizontal scalability, supporting the seamless addition of new nodes without downtime, which allows it to handle large volumes of data efficiently.
Stream and Queue Patterns
Pulsar supports both streaming and queuing messaging patterns, making it versatile for a wide range of use cases and simplifying architecture by reducing the need for multiple messaging systems.
Low Latency
Designed for low latency, Pulsar is suitable for applications requiring quick message processing, thanks to features like segment-oriented storage architecture.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Apache Pulsar is good.
Check the traffic stats of Apache Pulsar on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Apache Pulsar on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Apache Pulsar's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Apache Pulsar on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Apache Pulsar on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Northguard doesn’t look like it’s been open sourced? I’d be curious to know how it compares to Apache Pulsar [0]. I feel like I see some similarities reading the LI blog post. 0: https://pulsar.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Ingest real-time data from Kafka, Pulsar, or CDC sources like Postgresand MySQL, with built-in support for Debezium. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Apache Pulsar: Pulsar is a distributed messaging platform developed under the Apache Foundation. Its notable features include extremely low latency, support for multi-tenancy, geo-replication across regions, and tiered storage capabilities. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Apache Pulsar is an open-source distributed messaging platform originally developed by Yahoo! It provides a highly scalable solution for messaging and stream processing with robust durability and fault tolerance. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Stream-processing platforms such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, or Redpanda are specifically engineered to foster event-driven communication in a distributed system and they can be a great choice for developing loosely coupled applications. Stream processing platforms analyze data in motion, offering near-zero latency advantages. For example, consider an alert system for monitoring factory equipment. If a... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Apache Pulsar, a highly regarded open-source distributed messaging and streaming platform, has emerged as a formidable player in the developer tools landscape. It has garnered significant attention, competing with established giants like Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and newer entrants like Redpanda. Pulsar’s robust capabilities in messaging, data streaming, and background processing make it particularly attractive to large-scale data ecosystems in industries such as finance, telecommunications, and IoT.
One of the critical factors contributing to Apache Pulsar's popularity is its rich feature set, which includes extremely low latency, multi-tenancy, and geo-replication. These attributes cater exceptionally well to cloud-native applications, making Pulsar an optimal choice for businesses seeking scalability and resilience in their data architecture. Its support for a wide range of programming languages further simplifies integration, allowing developers to build messaging and streaming applications with relative ease.
Additionally, Pulsar’s tiered storage capabilities provide a cost-effective solution for managing vast amounts of data, a feature highlighted in discussions around its usage in real-time data ingestion from various sources, including Apache Kafka, Postgres, and MySQL. This ability to handle data at high velocities while ensuring durability and fault tolerance positions Pulsar as a reliable option for businesses looking to leverage continuous data streams.
Public discourse frequently cites Apache Pulsar in the context of real-time data processing and event-driven systems. In scenarios such as monitoring factory equipment for temperature anomalies, Pulsar’s real-time alert capabilities demonstrate near-zero latency, enabling timely interventions which are crucial in industrial settings.
Pulsar’s adoption is further emphasized in large-scale applications. Enterprises grappling with massive, distributed data systems appreciate its robustness and ability to maintain consistent performance across geographically dispersed environments. The platform’s origin at Yahoo! underscores its evolution to meet high-demand use cases, particularly for applications requiring efficient message queueing and background processing.
While Apache Pulsar holds a strong position, its market presence is often compared with Apache Kafka, a dominant force in stream processing. Commentaries often suggest that while Kafka excels in some areas, Pulsar distinguishes itself through features like native support for multi-tenancy and tiered storage. These differences represent strategic advantages for organizations assessing long-term cost efficiencies and scalability.
In summary, Apache Pulsar is widely regarded as a versatile and efficient platform within the developer community. Its ability to address the complex demands of contemporary data infrastructures and its alignment with cloud-native architectures make it a compelling choice. As the landscape of distributed messaging evolves, Pulsar's comprehensive feature offering and growing industry adoption may further solidify its reputation as a premiere solution in data streaming.
Do you know an article comparing Apache Pulsar to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Apache Pulsar good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Apache Pulsar here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
