Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Oozie VS Protocol Buffers

Compare Apache Oozie VS Protocol Buffers and see what are their differences

Apache Oozie logo Apache Oozie

Apache Oozie Workflow Scheduler for Hadoop

Protocol Buffers logo Protocol Buffers

A method for serializing and interchanging structured data.
  • Apache Oozie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25
  • Protocol Buffers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Apache Oozie videos

Migrating Apache Oozie Workflows to Apache Airflow

More videos:

  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager
  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager

Protocol Buffers videos

Protocol Buffers- A Banked Journey - Christopher Reeves

More videos:

  • Review - justforfunc #30: The Basics of Protocol Buffers
  • Review - Complete Introduction to Protocol Buffers 3 : How are Protocol Buffers used?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Oozie and Protocol Buffers)
Workflow Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Mobile Apps
0 0%
100% 100
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Configuration Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Oozie and Protocol Buffers. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Oozie and Protocol Buffers

Apache Oozie Reviews

10 Best Airflow Alternatives for 2024
One of the workflow scheduler services/applications operating on the Hadoop cluster is Apache Oozie. It is used to handle Hadoop tasks such as Hive, Sqoop, SQL, MapReduce, and HDFS operations such as distcp. It is a system that manages the workflow of jobs that are reliant on each other. Users can design Directed Acyclic Graphs of processes here, which can be performed in...
Source: hevodata.com

Protocol Buffers Reviews

We have no reviews of Protocol Buffers yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protocol Buffers seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Oozie. While we know about 15 links to Protocol Buffers, we've tracked only 1 mention of Apache Oozie. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Oozie mentions (1)

Protocol Buffers mentions (15)

  • Did OpenTelemetry deliver on its promise in 2023?
    > Aren’t a standard You mean like an IETF standard? That is true, although the specification is quite simple to implement. It is certainly a de-facto standard, even if it hasn’t been standardized by the IETF or IEEE or ANSI or ECMA. > inherently limits anything built on top of them to not be a standard either I’m not sure that strictly follows. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9232 for example directly... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • How to Keep a History of MQTT Data With Node.js
    The MQTT protocol is widely used in IoT applications because of its simplicity and ability to connect different data sources to applications using a publish/subscribe model. While many MQTT brokers support persistent sessions and can store message history as long as an MQTT client is not available, there may be cases where data needs to be stored for a longer period. In such cases, it is recommended to use a time... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Dive into Mocking Your Microservice Dependencies with Skyramp
    Generate a mock from an API definition Skyramp simplifies the process of mocking by allowing you to generate mocks directly from your API definitions, such as OpenAPI or Protobuf. This means you can easily create realistic mocks that mimic the behavior of your actual microservices. With the Skyramp CLI, it's as easy as running skyramp mocker generate ... With the relevant inputs. See the Skyramp Docs for which... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Introducing Persisted Copilot Chats - Integrated AI Across your Workflow
    Tsavo also touched upon how consistency is also crucial at the SDK level and the data layer. A fun fact about our company is that a majority of our client-side SDKs are generated off of protobuf specs or HTTP open API specs. This means that when a new endpoint with a certain capability is released, we can quickly have it available in Kotlin, TypeScript, Dart, Rust, Go, and some other languages. This rapid... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • A small warning about UDP based protocols
    This is a bit similar to roll your own crypto conversation. It is fun, and a great way to learn. And once done, you should do well to never deploy your own crypto in any real life application. Friends don't let friends roll their own protocol over UDP (or IP; I mean why not?). There are very few apps that have such an explicit requirements that they can't do away with TLS over any number of existing, and well... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Oozie and Protocol Buffers, you can also consider the following products

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Eno - Fast, human readable, plain-text data format